濘 mud, miry, muddy, stagnant 沁,宀,皿,丁,汀,寍,氵,寧,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

濘

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ネイ
NE　I

Kun-yomi

ぬか(る
nu　ka　ru

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

沁

シン,し seeping, soaking, percolating; to be infected

　FLUID with SPEWING PENIS, INTENT, -MINDED, -HEARTED
　

宀

ベン,メン,× surround from above, deliberately out-of-reach, at home, roofed area

　SURROUND, COVERED ALL SIDES from above (marker)
　

皿

ベイ,さら container, trough, basket, tray, plate, dish, wide pan, vessel, bowl, basin, netting claptrap on rod

　NETTING on ROD
…or: NETTING to the FULL EXTENT
…or: SNARED ONE
…or: SPURTING STANCE in SPREAD LEGS
…or: SURROUNDED BY COPULATION ARRAY
…or: RODS UP in SPREAD LEGS
…or: multiple ORIFICES, GOODS in ARRAY
…or: CONTAINMENT SURROUNDING a SPURTING ROD
　

丁

チョウ,テイ,チン,トウ,ひのと male adult, blasting discharge from a barrel, robust, vigorous, flaming, butyl, cubed, raised to the third power, the ding in one's dong

　STREAMING from ROD
…or: ARRAY of UNPLEASANT BARBS
　

汀

テイ,みぎわ,なぎさ shoreline, sandy shoal, sandbar; foamy line deposits from wave actions

　FLUID with ARRAY of STREAMS
…or: FLUIDS with ROBUST, VIGOROUS MALE
…or: FLUID with BLASTS
　

寍

ネイ,むし a comparison, rather, [this]…is better [or, not]

　AT HOME, DELIBERATELY OUT-OF-REACH and FEELINGS, THOUGHTS, INTENT, MIND, HEART, SPEWING PENIS with TROUGH, VESSEL, NETTING CLAPTRAP ON ROD
　

氵

×,さんずい fluidity, fluid

　emphasis on MANY DRIPS, DRIPPING, COOLING PROCESS
…or: MANY TIMES DROPS
　

寧

ネイ,むし repose, contentment, peaceful, tranquil; preferable, rather, instead, resting after exertion or strain

　DELIBERATELY OUT-OF-REACH and FEELINGS, THOUGHTS, SPEWING PENIS with NETTING REMOVED, VESSEL of MALE ADULT
…or: A COMPARISON, RATHER with MALE ADULT, BLASTING DISCHARGE
　

Meanings of elements

SEEPING, SOAKING, PERCOLATING, TO BE INFECTED and SURROUNDED, DELIBERATELY OUT-OF-REACH AT HOME with NETTING CLAPTRAP ON ROD, TROUGH, BASKET and with MALE ADULT BLASTING DISCHARGE FROM A BARREL, VIGOROUS FLAMING SENSATION
…or: SHORELINE, SANDY SHOAL, SANDBAR, FOAMY LINE DEPOSITS FROM WAVE ACTIONS with A COMPARISON, RATHER, [THIS]…IS BETTER [OR, NOT]
…or: FLUID with REPOSE, CONTENTMENT, PEACEFUL, TRANQUIL, RESTING AFTER EXERTION OR STRAIN
…or: FLUID and PREFERENCE FOR AN ADULT MALE, CONTENTMENT WITH MALE

Suggesting concepts of a bad stench from being stagnant or due to decaying material, and being mucky, mired as is fecal slurry: where「flowing is preferred and peaceful」or「flow of fluids while out-of-reach, spewed into netting from male.」

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: muddy
Japanese EDRDG: muddiness
Unihan extended: mud; miry, muddy, stagnant

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.