注意:このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

  • Glyph.12393
  • Strokes: 20
  • old_forms


MingLiU:
Mincho:
Gothic:

Login    Welcome! Introduction    
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.


On-yomi   [ Toggle rōmaji ]
シャク ・ セキ
SHA KU ・ SE KI
Kun-yomi
とく ・ す(てる ・ ゆる(す
to ku ・ su te ru ・ yu ru su

Glyph elements  [ Toggle Font ]

Meanings of elements
REPEATED EMISSIONS while MONITORING AN INFECTION, SPREADING DISEASE
…or: ABLE TO DISTINGUISH AND RECOGNIZE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CLEAN EMISSIONS OF SEMEN AND THOSE WITH GONORRHEA with GUARDED CLOSELY WATCHED SCROTUM, GROIN OF MALE, GENITALS AND ANUS
Left element of「distinguish, recognize. Repeated sticky splats or puckered anus」「able to distinguish and recognize the difference between clean emissions of semen and those with gonorrhea.」Right element「captured, imprisoned in a line, guarded.」Modern replacement element of「genitals leashed」that describes tying the genitals of prisoners together with a minimum of slack between persons to prevent escape, much like a dog and bitch that cannot run and escape hunters while copulating. Right element is said to be the same pronunciation as the word「Buddha」in Sanskrit. Together meaning to「distinguish and recognize Buddha as…[you can fill in the blank here]」but otherwise meaning to EXPLAIN, to RELEASE as「repeated emissions while monitoring a genital disease.」Today, it is not clear whether Siddhartha suffered from gonorrhea, but if so, it would be no surprise to learn that all references have been expunged from the official records…before setting off to find enlightenment, he did utilize a large harem consisting mostly of women.
 Note that the Chinese sages lampooned religion in glyphs as often as they lampooned royalty, and generally detested Buddhism (they themselves were Taoists). Literally, elements also depict a line of prisoners or slaves tied together with a long rope binding each man's testicles at very short intervals (about one foot apart) to prevent escape by causing the group to move in unison or risk falling over and preventing them from running off, but the close proximity to the person in front of each prisoner, combined with the various deprivations normally associated with captivity, may have promoted some repeated anal bobbing actions of each man in line with the person in front, even if accidental and not a deliberate attempt at penetration. These physical conditions that the prisoners were subjected to EXPLAINED all these various and obvious actions, likely thought as quite comical by the guards, and may have also caused the RELEASE of some pent-up frustrations. Note again that the sages generally were not adherents of Buddhism, so to disrespect that philosophy caused no concern among them. Further note that it was unlikely slaves or prisoners would have ever been given rice repeatedly to sort out the pebbles, as some scholars suggest.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: to explain; to release; Buddha (abbr. for 釋迦牟尼|释迦牟尼 ); Buddhism
Unihan extended: interpret, elucidate; release
EDRDG: explain

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.


Chinese usage: 45 entries


Related glyphs [ Toggle font ]


  • Glyph.12393
  • Strokes: 20
  • old_forms

   


Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.

This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.

This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.

This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.


Protected by Copyscape
Copyright © 2010-2026 debunKanji.com, all rights reserved.