蠻 barbarian, hairy brute bully savage, reckless, Huns, Goths, Caucasians, Europeans and their descendants 䜌,虫,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

蠻

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

バン
BA　N

Kun-yomi

えびす
e　bi　su

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

䜌

× entanglements due to sexual relations, complicated chaos, much dripping, flowing down, continuous and uninterrupted wild and crazy sex, a distraction, attention-getting

　PENILE EMISSIONS and INTERCOURSE, SEXUAL FOREPLAY and PENILE EMISSIONS
…or: INTERCOURSE within multiple WHAT!? SCREAMING AND HOLLERING, SMALLEST YOUNGEST MOST TENDER, NEVER-ENDING with SMALL YOUNG MINOR MONS VENUS, MONS PUBIS DEEPLY FELT, DEEP FEELING, DIFFICULT TO FORGET
　

虫

チュウ,キ,むし snake, worm, caterpillar, insect, larva, bugs, pathogens, corkscrew demons, lower life form, to have a lover, person with a particular undesirable characteristic

　ROD in ORIFICE with REPEATEDLY BOBBING HEAD and DRIP
…or: TWO-SIDED LOOSE and DRIPPING
…or: ORIFICE BITING and DRIPPING
…or: MOUTH and TAIL
…or: SHORT LEG in VULVA
…or: WITHIN, AMONG and HEAD UP AND IN with emphasis
　

Meanings of elements

ENTANGLING COMPLICATED SNAKE
…or: DRIPPING SWEATY BUG
…or: FUCKING SNAKES

Sources equate this glyph both with areas south of China, but also with folk having hairy bodies: European Caucasians are generally much hairier than Asians. Japanese pronunciation ebisu equates this glyph with the Ainu, also much hairier folk than others of East Asia, with strong genetic evidence that the Ainu are more closely related to European Caucasians than to other Orientals. Top element is「thread-say-thread」「complicated speech」「ejaculate, foreplay, ejaculate」or「heavy dripping」from sexual activity being the prime factor in「entangling complications」of anyone's life. By pairing that element with「snakes, worms, insects, diseased stinky short leg in vulva, juxtaposed orifices」this glyph referred to most people from any region outside China, as an「entangled pit of copulating snakes, a complicated bowl of insect maggots」with no clear lineage. Represents all lower-class uncivilized insects such as this writer, wormy, asp-like folk who seem to heavily drip more armpit sweat than the Chinese. In addition, the BARBARIANS speak different languages than do the Chinese, and the elements of「threads of speech with more threads, complicated speech from snakes, demonic pathogens」applies as well.

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: barbarian; bullying; very; quite; rough; reckless
Japanese EDRDG: barbarian
Unihan extended: barbarians; barbarous, savage

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.