狌 stoat, carnivorous weasels, arrested development, diapause, copulating with newborns 犭,ノ,龶,生,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

狌

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ショウ　･　セイ　･　ソウ
SHO　U　･　SE　I　･　SO　U

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

犭

× canid (male dog or female bitch), pig, animal, beast

　HEAD REPEATED in NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT
　

ノ

× HTML entity: ノ head, sliding down, declining, dammed flow

　HEAD SLIDING DOWN
　

龶

× HTML entity: 龶 prick, to stab, tapered, painful condition, thorn, scorpion telson with setae bristles

　MANY TIMES with RECIPROCAL ROD MOTION
…or: PENIS within CRAFTY FLESH SEAM
…or: ROD UP with TURGID-FLACCID CHANGING STATE
…or: ROD within FECES
…or: ARRAY of FLESH SEAMS
　

生

セイ,ショウ,い,う,うま,うまれ,お,は,き,なま,なま～,む,～う all stages of life, birth, raw, head of prick

　HEAD and PAINFUL CONDITION
…or: HEAD on PRICK
…or: PRONE in FECES
…or: ROD with MEAT ASSETS
　

Meanings of elements

BEAST with ALL STAGES OF LIFE, HEAD OF PRICK

A STOAT is a species of mustelid, a small but powerful predator hunting mostly rabbits (lagomorphs) and rodents. Adult male stoats「beast with prick head for all stages of life, at birth」will copulate with completely juvenile female stoats which are so newly birthed that the females do not yet possess the ability to see or hear, typically still blind, deaf, and nearly hairless: an animal without the morality of (most, but not all) modern human cultures. Many carnivores [and pedophiles] hunt the young of their prey as the meat easiest to capture and possessing the most tender and tastiest meat. Because the female is an unweaned infant when fertilized, the embryos do not immediately implant in the uterus. Instead, they undergo a prolonged period of ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT (diapause) lasting roughly 9 to 10 months.
One point worth noting is that human beings are the only animal known to not eat only raw meat; that is to say, humans routinely cook meat prior to ingestion (but, not always). Therefore, reading these elements as "beast with raw" or as "beast with life" does not narrow the field of possibilities at all, leaving「beast with prick head for all stages of life, at birth」likely as the only viable reading. Other animals may prefer meat cooked by humans over raw meat though, and who can argue with barbeque in that regard? Other animals, such as damselflies and dragonflies, fig wasps, pyemotid mites, nematodes and parasitic worms also copulate with newly hatched females of their species, but are not normally considered to be "hairy beasts" as are the STOATS, being a famous mammalian outlier.
Perhaps ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT applies mentally and morally as well as anatomically when COPULATING WITH NEWBORNS.

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.