Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
SHO U ・ SE I ・ SO U
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
One point worth noting is that human beings are the only animal known to not eat only raw meat; that is to say, humans routinely cook meat prior to ingestion (but, not always). Therefore, reading these elements as "beast with raw" or as "beast with life" does not narrow the field of possibilities at all, leaving「beast with prick head for all stages of life, at birth」likely as the only viable reading. Other animals may prefer meat cooked by humans over raw meat though, and who can argue with barbeque in that regard? Other animals, such as damselflies and dragonflies, fig wasps, pyemotid mites, nematodes and parasitic worms also copulate with newly hatched females of their species, but are not normally considered to be "hairy beasts" as are the STOATS, being a famous mammalian outlier.
Perhaps ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT applies mentally and morally as well as anatomically when COPULATING WITH NEWBORNS.
External source definitions
none located, and you ought to ask yourself, why not?
definition speculated from combining the elements, or, from usage in other glyphs
Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that)
and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system.
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is!
Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up.
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary.
This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.
Primal elements
Used in glyphs (or, see also): 1 entry
Related glyphs [ Toggle font ]
- Glyph.02318
- Strokes: 08
- censored
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.