奚 what? where? why? cockspur, rescue, purchased servant ⺼,ー,⺍,爫,幺,大,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

奚

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ケイ
KE　I

Kun-yomi

なんぞ
na　n　zo

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

⺼

× HTML entity: ⺼ body meat or flesh; meat of disintegrated feet; chicks and bunnies

　ERECTION and CLEVER with DROPS
…or: STIFF with CONGEALING and WRAPPED NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED BONES
…or: QUICK MOVEMENTS with FLEDGLING WING
　

ー

× HTML entity: ー repeated, bobbing

　REPEATED BOBBING
　

⺍

× HTML entity: ⺍ dazzle, flashes; fiery, light rays, sparkle, flames; loose stuff spewing

　emphasis on EMISSIONS
　

爫

× hand or claw reaching

　REPEATED BOBBING UP AND DOWN CONTINUOUSLY and DAZZLE, FLASHES, FIERY, SPARKLE, FLAMES, LOOSE STUFF SPEWING
…or: CLAWING AT, SCRATCHING AT, HAND REACHING OR GRASPING
…or: REPEATED EMISSIONS DOWN with emphasis
　

幺

⺕ウ,ちいさい tiny smallest youngest, most tender, the one, professional care needed, never-ending, figure-eight shape; shouting screaming hollering what!?

　LOOSE UNBOUND with DRIPPING STENCH CLOUD
…or: emphasis on even more emphasis on LOOSE DRIPPING STENCH, SELF SECRET PRIVATE
　

大

ダイ,タイ,おお～,～おお relatively big condition; two-handed both hands

　ROD TAUT and ERECT
…or: HAND TAUT
…or: HAND with marker for other hand, too
…or: ROD of MALE ADULT
　

Meanings of elements

REPEATEDLY BOBBING UP AND DOWN with HAND REACHING and with WHAT!? SCREAMING AND HOLLERING, SMALLEST, YOUNGEST, MOST TENDER, PROFESSIONAL CARE NEEDED and TWO-HANDED, BOTH HANDS, BIG
…or: REPEATEDLY HEAD BOBBING with DAZZLE, FLASHES, LOOSE STUFF SPEWING or with CLAW REACHING and with WHAT!? SCREAMING AND HOLLERING, NEVER-ENDING FIGURE-EIGHT SHAPE and LARGE, GREAT, GRAND, BIG, MANY
…or: MEAT GRASPING LOOSE AND DRIPPING IN TWO HANDS

Old Chinese elements of「meat very loose and dripping with two-handed」to mean WHAT? WHERE? WHY? and so on may need no further explanation.
Some sources suggest「claw」「difficult to see, loose and dripping」and「big, both hands (or, perhaps legs in this case)」depicts the COCKSPUR on the back side of a rooster's leg. But frankly, a「cock」like a「spur」also is suggested by「two hands on meat very loose and dripping.」As「smallest screaming and hollering」suggests that「reaching down two-handed」depicts a RESCUE attempt, which might also be another obvious reference to one's cock meat, potentially. Elements suggest a bone puncture wound during or subsequent to foot-dis-integrating, and that would obviously become a COCK SPUR perhaps requiring a RESCUE ATTEMPT by a SERVANT to unsnag the connected meats, and an investigation into WHAT? WHERE? WHY?

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: (literary) what?; where?; why?
Japanese EDRDG: servant, what, why
Unihan extended: where? what? how? why?; servant

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.