蚧 horny toads, red spotted lizard, to be toady 厶,吤,虫,介,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

蚧

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

カイ
KA　I

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

厶

シ,ボウ,ム,わたくし,ござ loosely dripping, odoriferous secret, private

　AMORPHOUS, LOOSE, POTENTIALLY ODORIFEROUS with DRIP
　

吤

カイ,ケ,こえ interlude, pause

　ORIFICE, MOUTH, CAVITY OR PASSAGE OF THE BODY and BE IN BETWEEN, LIE OR COME BETWEEN, ASSIST
　

虫

チュウ,キ,むし snake, worm, caterpillar, insect, larva, bugs, pathogens, corkscrew demons, lower life form, to have a lover, person with a particular undesirable characteristic

　ROD in ORIFICE with REPEATEDLY BOBBING HEAD and DRIP
…or: TWO-SIDED LOOSE and DRIPPING
…or: ORIFICE BITING and DRIPPING
…or: MOUTH and TAIL
…or: SHORT LEG in VULVA
…or: WITHIN, AMONG and HEAD UP AND IN with emphasis
　

介

カイ,× be in between, lie between, jammed in between, come between, mediate, assist; to introduce; to wear an outer shell, armored

　PERSON with ERECTION and ROD, RECIPROCATING MOTIONS
　

Meanings of elements

LOOSE DRIPPING CLOUD with INTERLUDE
…or: SNAKE, WORM and BE IN BETWEEN, LIE BETWEEN, COME BETWEEN, TO WEAR AN OUTER SHELL

It is difficult to identify exactly the externally referenced animals:「snake-worm (amphibian) wearing an outer shell」as the Nankiang horned toad. There are many species of red-spotted reptiles and amphibians. If used medicinally in China, then perhaps LIZARD can be a「snake that assists」or perhaps what「lies between」the combination of a reptile and shellfish might conceivably be an amphibian, such as a common TOAD that is horny and copulates by「lying between」others in a clusterfucking arrangement, toad reproduction actualized as an assisted clusterfuck in fact (these animals may have been the inspiration for that term). The successful males literally「wear a female as an outer shell」for days in a long「sexual interlude」that lays「loose dripping clouds」of gelatinous eggs in long strings:
　「The males mount the females' backs, grasping them with their fore limbs under the armpits in a grip that is known as amplexus. The males are very enthusiastic, will try to grasp fish or inanimate objects and often mount the backs of other males. Sometimes several toads form a heap, each male trying to grasp the female at the base. It is a stressful period and mortality is high among breeding toads. A successful male stays in amplexus for several days and, as the female lays a long, double string of small black eggs, he fertilises them with his sperm. As the pair wander piggyback around the shallow edges of the pond, the gelatinous egg strings, which may contain 3000 to 6000 eggs and be 3 to 4.5 metres (10 to 15 ft) in length, get tangled in plant stalks.」
　　[　https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_toad 2015-02-02　]　

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: horned toad
Unihan extended: a red spotted lizard, used as medicine
EDRDG: red spotted lizard (used as medicine)

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.