摋 squeeze, strangulation, to wring (a neck), discarding a used and filled poultice, bougie reaming and gleet-squeezing extraction session; emasculation, genital amputation; avenging oneself upon a defeated enemy, tearing off a person's genitalia bare-handed 投,木,丶,扌,殺,殺,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

摋

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

サツ　･　サチ　･　セツ　･　セチ
SA　TSU　･　SA　CHI　･　SE　TSU　･　SE　CHI

Kun-yomi

う(つ
u　tsu

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

投

トウ,な,～な cast, toss, fling, flick, throw; invest, sell at a loss

　PULL UP, JERK UP AND DOWN, STRUGGLE UNTIL FREE, SOMETHING COVERED BY A WHITE FOAMY HEAD, PIERCE, PRICK, STAB, PENETRATION; CLASSIFIER FOR FLOWERS AND BANKNOTE MONEY with HAND, ROD ERECTION with CROTCH ONCE AGAIN, ONE MORE TIME, THIS OR THAT, YIELD, BOTH OF THEM, FURTHER AND MORE
…or: TALENTED USING BOTH OF ONE'S HANDS TO ACCOMPLISH A TASK with STRETCHED SKIN OF CROTCH, THE TOOLS OF ONE'S TRADE, WEAPON READIED, SPEAR-LIKE SHAPE, STIFF ROD
　

木

ボク,モク,き,こ～ wood, woody stalk, stem, wooden, a woody, tree, implanted, simple, simpleton, coffin, encased death, unfeeling, numb

　TWISTING a TAUT HEAD
…or: SCREWING EMISSIONS
…or: HAND on TAUT ROD
　

丶

チュ,× emphasized part of a glyph

　[emphasis is HERE in a glyph]
　

扌

シュ,× talented, using both of one's hands to accomplish a task

　TALENT
…or: USING BOTH HANDS
…or: ARRAY of STREAMS with SLIDING HEAD IN
　

殺

サツ,サイ,セツ,ころ,～ごろ,そ HTML entity: 殺 hurt, kill, slaughter, murder; cut down, slice off, to split, weaken or reduce

　SOFT SPOT and STICKY GOO MAGIC TECHNIQUE with STRETCHED SKIN, SHEATH of CROTCH or SPEAR-LIKE SHAPE, STIFF ROD
…or: SOFT SPOT of WOODY with STRETCHED SKIN SHEATH of CROTCH
…or: WEAVE, NETTING on WOODY or emphasis on SCREWING NEEDLE EMISSIONS and STRETCHED SKIN SHEATH of CROTCH
…or: NETTING WEAVE with INTENTION and CROTCH ONCE AGAIN, ONE MORE TIME YIELDING, FURTHERMORE
…or: WEAVE on WOODY and STRETCHED SKIN OF CROTCH, TOOLS OF ONE'S TRADE, SPEAR-LIKE SHAPE, STIFF ROD
　

殺

サツ,サイ,セツ,ころ,～ごろ,そ HTML entity: 殺 hurt, kill, slaughter, murder; cut down, slice off, to split, weaken or reduce

Meanings of elements

CAST, TOSS, FLING, FLICK, THROW, SELL AT A LOSS with WEAVING SHUTTLING ACTION and emphasis on WOODY STALK, STEM
…or: TALENTED USING BOTH OF ONE'S HANDS TO ACCOMPLISH A TASK with HURT, KILL, SLAUGHTER, CUT DOWN, SLICE OFF, TO SPLIT, WEAKEN, REDUCE
…or: WEAVE, NET on WOODY, emphasis on STICKY GOO, SCREWING NEEDLE EMISSIONS inside CAST, TOSS, FLING, FLICK

「Use talented hands in killing, soft spot gooey technique, or the woody, while stretching crotch skin」as FLICK AWAY, FLUNG spunk. Elements also depict a penectomy likely for reasons related to ill health. WRINGING a neck (one's own, or that of another). To SQUEEZE the life out of something or someone.

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.