䙆 cheongsam, a Chinese dress with slits on each side worn by concubines and service providers 祆,祅,佘,′,癶,衤,癸,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

䙆

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

祆

ケン,テン,× Sun god; supreme deity; brightest flashing

　CONCUBINE, SERVICE PROVIDER and CHANGING STATE FLACCID-TURGID, TWICE
…or: WIDELY ENDURED
…or: DISPLAY in SKY
…or: RELIGION of HEAVEN
　

祅

⺕ウ,わざわ evil spirit, goblin, witchcraft, calamity, disaster

　CONCUBINE, SERVICE PROVIDER and REPEATEDLY ARRAYED
…or: REPEATEDLY ENDURED, NO CURE POSSIBLE
…or: RELIGION with TO DIE YOUNG
…or: SHOW, DISPLAY with TENDER YOUTH
　

佘

シャ,× concubine name, service provider

　IN FRONT OF PERSON is MALE with EMISSIONS
…or: PERSON and SHOWN, DISPLAYED, DIVINE, RELIGIOUS
…or: IN FRONT OF PERSON is ARRAY of SMALL YOUTH
…or: PERSON and FLACCID-TURGID with STREAMING EMISSIONS
　

′

癶

ハツ,× feet in some sort of stance, not walking but using legs, unstable; foot use while inverted

　NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT (sole arch marked) SPURTING
…or: CLEVER STANCE
　

衤

×,ころも cloth, cloths, clothes, clothing

　emphasis on the DISPLAY
…or: emphasis on NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT with VERTICAL PERSON WHO SITS MOST OF THE TIME
…or: NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT DRIPPING VERTICALLY with emphasis
…or: NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT with emphasis on FLACCID ROD
　

癸

キ,みずのと small discharge, small amount of fluid, falling drips or drops

　FEET IN SOME SORT OF STANCE, UNSTABLE and THRUSTING DOWNWARD, DRY, DRAIN, EBB, DEFENSIVE, MAIN TRUNK OR SHAFT and TAUT
…or: FOOT IN USE WHILE INVERTED with HEAVEN, DIVINE, CELESTIAL, BOUNDLESS, NO LIMIT, NEVER-ENDING, HEAVENLY, SKY
　

Meanings of elements

GODDESS, IMP, CONCUBINE emphasized with SPREAD FEET STANCE
…or: CLOTHING and SMALL AMOUNT OF FLUID, FALLING DRIPS OR DROPS
…or: PERSON DISPLAYING HEAVENLY MEAT STANCE

「Clothing with a few drips, drops of fluid, stance for downward thrusting penis on one side and then the other side, too」refers to the slit on each side extending from the waist or hip to the bottom hem of a body-hugging, one-piece Chinese dress for women enabling freedom of movement and easy access to genitals, worn by 'high class' ladies of the court and concubines (not serfs), that especially accentuated the female figure inside and provided flashing glimpses of flesh beneath…why else would high-class court ladies need「freedom of movement」when there were servants and slaves all around, except to enable the lords to spurt a few drops here, and then there? for what possible reason would these women have the need to bend over or down otherwise?…okay you're right, kneeling to fellate was another.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Unihan extended: slits on the lower part of a gown for freedom of movement

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.