褕 loose garment, a loosely fitting garment resembling a long shirt, a blouse, pajama top (no bottom), nightshirt, nightgown 衤,兪,俞,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

褕

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ユ　･　⺕ウ　･　トウ　･　ズ
YU　･　YO　U　･　TO　U　･　ZU

Kun-yomi

はねかざり
ha　ne　ka　za　ri

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

衤

×,ころも cloth, cloths, clothes, clothing

　emphasis on the DISPLAY
…or: emphasis on NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT with VERTICAL PERSON WHO SITS MOST OF THE TIME
…or: NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT DRIPPING VERTICALLY with emphasis
…or: NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT with emphasis on FLACCID ROD
　

兪

ツ,トウ,ユ,しかり lord's assent or consent; conveyed, gone to heaven

　ASSEMBLE FLESH, CHICKS AND BUNNIES with TWO MISSHAPEN LOOSE BUSTED FEET
…or: BECOME A MEMBER with RECIPROCATING ROD MOTION and CHICKS BUNNY MEAT and TWO NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FEET
　

俞

× lord's assent, accede, consent; conveyed, gone to heaven, bevy of new divas, transport, delivery, consent to reaming meat

　ENTER, GO INTO, PENETRATE, PLACE INSIDE with RECIPROCATING ROD MOTION, INDICATES EXTENT and REAMING MEAT, PUNISHING, EXCRUCIATING, CUTTING INTO LIVING FLESH
…or: IN FRONT OF A PERSON, ASSEMBLY OF PEOPLE with AMPUTATION
　

Meanings of elements

CLOTH, CLOTHS, CLOTHES, CLOTHING with LORD'S CONSENT, CONVEYED TO HEAVEN, BEVY OF NEW DIVAS
…or: CLOTH, CLOTHS, CLOTHES, CLOTHING and INSERTION ENTER GO INTO, PUT INTO, TO PLACE INSIDE, CONFIRM, AGREE with HORIZONTAL RECIPROCATING ROD MOTION, ROD STALK, INDICATES EXTENT and REAMING MEAT
…or: CLOTHING of CONSENT TO MEAT REAMING

A「loose garment」might imply「consent to meat insertion and reaming」due to being somewhat revealing of the wearer's flesh, and facilitates quick and easy removal or flipping out of the way of an orifice or two…at least, that's what some judges in some jurisdictions still say today to a female rape victim who was wearing only a loose halter top with the shortest of shorts or miniskirt when accosted, and was 'asking for it' in one sense, giving her implied consent, a concept that has been around for at least thousands of years as shown by this glyph, whether we agree with that thinking or not. A「loose garment」may cause an onlooker to lose his head, figuratively.「Meats two loosened」as unfettered breasts in a loose blouse and so on…use your imagination for this glyph, as there are various scenarios possible.

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: loose garment
Japanese EDRDG: shirt
Unihan extended: shirt

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.