牣 to stuff inside, to fill by stuffing into, to schtup, to stuff until full, stuff it, cram it, ram it, jam it, stuff it 牜,刃,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

牣

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ジン　･　ニン
JI　N　･　NI　N

Kun-yomi

み(ちる
mi　chi　ru

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

牜

× cattle, beef meat, important thing, herded meat stock, animal husbandry, a cash cow, female animals providing milk and meat, animals as a store of future value and medium of exchange

　HEAD with TALENT
…or: USE TWO HANDS on HEAD
…or: HEAD on ROD VERTICAL TWICE
　

刃

ジン,ニン,は,やいば,き an edge, blade edge; grain not hulled

　BLADE as marked
　

Meanings of elements

HERD MEAT ASSET and a REAMING ERECTION
…or: HERD MEAT ASSET with emphasis on ERECTION in NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT

Left element as a「thing of importance」refers to sacrificed meat still on the hoof as shown in the right element,「reaming no-longer-integrated feet with emphasis on erection.」 Literally STUFFING SOMETHING, anything, into cattle is not so prudent or wise since both bulls and cows can become upset by it, and likely outweigh most humans while also being able to run much faster than most folks…many cattle are also equipped with sharp head horns, so this glyph likely did not refer to「cattle reaming.」On the other hand, Chinese service providers with no-longer-integrated feet, meat prepared exactly for the purpose of stuffing, could not run fast at all.
　As depicted in erotic Chinese art, men in dynastic China masturbated by wrapping no-longer-integrated feet around an erect penis ostensibly to lower the risk of contracting a sexually transmissible disease or infection that often occurred when performing coitus within some sort of mucous membrane system of a female service provider, and, to gain hand-control over the pressure applied to the foot meat surrounding a weakened penis that functioned as a living cockring.
　「Bound feet were once considered intensely erotic in Chinese culture. …The process was started before the arch of the foot had a chance to develop fully, usually between the ages of 2 and 5. …Qing Dynasty sex manuals listed 48 different ways of playing with women's [no-longer-integrated] bound feet」(after removing the binding cloths, of course)
　　[　https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_binding 2012-12-17　]　
　「Viewing women as commodities [see 品] was also made customary from Song Dynasty (960 - 1279) forward, both in the suddenly expanded labor market and within relationships. Men could sell their female kin to slavery or prostitution, and frequently did.」
　　[　https://www.zum.de/whkmla/sp/0910/hersheys/hersheys5.html 2011-04-05　]　

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: fill up; to stuff
Unihan extended: fill, stuff; full
EDRDG: fill; stuff; full

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.