屈 deeply bending over, crouched, feeling wronged, to shrink from daunted, submissive, yield, flinch, feeling as if anally raped, castration 丿,咄,尸,出,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

屈

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

クツ
KU　TSU

Kun-yomi

かが(む　･　かが(める
ka　ga　mu　･　ka　ga　me　ru

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

丿

ヘツ,えい,よう straight up erect, quick jerking movement, stretched taut

　ERECT, FLING
　

咄

トツ,はなし,しか noise of rage, cry out in anger

　MOUTH and DRAMATICS, ROLE PLAYING, GO BEYOND, GUSHING DISCHARGE
…or: ORIFICE with DRAMATIC, PLAYED A ROLE IN, GUSHING DISCHARGE, TIME EXPIRED, GO BEYOND, EMERGE, TO GO OR COME OUT, PULLOUT, PUT OUT, TAKE OUT OF
　

尸

シ,かたしろ corpse, excretion squatting, buttocks

　MOVEMENT with ORIFICE
…or: ERECT with IN-AND-OUT
　

出

シュツ,スイ,で,～で,だ,～だ,い dramatic, played a role in [doing…], acting, role playing, to go beyond, emerge, to come out later after first going in, to flow outward, gushing out, efflux, time expired, pullout, put out, take out of, occur, produce rise, protrude, it goes in—it must come out

　LAVA on MOUNTAIN
…or: PLANT SHOOT on PLANT STEM
…or: GLANS within CAVITY
…or: GLANS on GLANS
　

Meanings of elements

STIFF ERECTION with NOISE OF RAGE, CRY OUT IN ANGER, SCREAMING IN A RAGE
…or: BUTTOCKS and PLAYED A ROLE IN, PUT OUT, GO BEYOND, EMERGE, GUSHING EFFLUX, PROTRUDE, STICK OUT
…or: GENITALS with TAKE OUT, DRAMATIC

「Erection with screaming in a mad rage」might be a pretty good reason for a small young service provider to YIELD, be SUBMISSIVE, CROUCH, BEND OVER and perhaps cover her head with her arms, FLINCHING. As such, the glyph may refer to ewe, too.
　Meaning CASTRATION as a form of Chinese punishment for males,「put out your genitals」so that they can「go beyond the natural limit」of one's scrotum and be lopped, pulled, gnawed, ripped from your body, or removed with the edge of a dull spoon. YIELDING, SUBMISSIVE, CROUCH, BEND OVER would also refer to the manner and posture assumed after surgery.
　Literally,「put out, squat, emerging buttocks or genitals」as in BENDING OVER and squatting, perhaps to defecate, urinate, to dig a hole or burrow, or for another person to burrow into as「buttocks going beyond」the natural pose or uses. Note that YIELDING, SUBMISSIVE, CROUCH, BEND OVER would also refer to the manner and posture assumed in which a person might be ordered to「put out, expose genitals」by bending over in preparation to receive some sort of dramatic punishment.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: bent; to feel wronged
Japanese: to feel down, to yield, to give in, to be daunted, to bend, to shrink, to stoop, to lean over, to bend down, to crouch, to bow, to lean in
Unihan extended: bend, flex; bent, crooked; crouch
EDRDG: yield; bend; flinch; submit

Used within names (nanori)
くっ

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.