臭 stink, emitting a foul odor, smells of [something] (literally or figuratively), suspicious, something fishy or humanly, sense of smell, olfactory 自,犬,大,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

臭

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

シュウ
SHU　U

Kun-yomi

くさ(い　･　～くさ(い　･　にお(う　･　にお(い
ku　sa　i　･　～ku　sa　i　･　ni　o　u　･　ni　o　i

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

自

ジ,シ,みずか,おの cerebral frontal lobe, I, self, itself, her/himself, oneself, personally, myself

　MARKED AS EMPHASIZED PART OF A GLYPH, THIS SPOT RIGHT HERE and CENTER OF A FLESHPOT, THE GOAL, PLACE WHERE EYES ARE FOCUSED, EYES, CONTENTS, EXPERIENCE, FAVORED, CARE
　

犬

ケン,いぬ,いぬ～ canid; domesticated dog

　TAUT LEASH with IN HAND
…or: BIG in TWO HANDS with emphasis
…or: ADULT MALE ROD with emphasis marker
　

大

ダイ,タイ,おお～,～おお relatively big condition; two-handed both hands

　ROD TAUT and ERECT
…or: HAND TAUT
…or: HAND with marker for other hand, too
…or: ROD of MALE ADULT
　

Meanings of elements

CEREBRAL FRONTAL LOBE of DOMESTICATED DOG
…or: MY OWN DOG
…or: emphasis on PURPOSE, AIM of my TWO HANDS

Formerly「cerebral frontal lobe, self」above「dog」depicting SCENT and「thought processing of dog, sniffing along a trail to track something desired」or, perhaps actually smelling bad enough to be able to smell your own self, one's「dog.」Note that many modern fonts eliminate the marker stroke that differentiates「two hands, big」from「dog」creating some confusion, although any animal with a「big cerebral frontal lobe」likely does have a greater SENSE OF SMELL than one with a smaller lobe due to a larger number of olfactory sense nerves present in the nasal cavities.
　The sense of smell of a dog is so keen that it recognizes individual「selves」and differentiates members of its pack, including its human master (the leader of the pack, in the dog's way of thinking) even after not seeing the person for many years. The cerebral frontal lobe is also where such memories are stored and olfactory sensations are processed in mammals such as dogs. Dogs principally identify humans and other animals by sniffing and recalling the smell of the anus, so it is natural for a dog to want to remember or become reacquainted with your「self」by sniffing your buttocks and orifice, behavior often seen with canines. Humans imitating this typically canine behavior is the source of the meaning STINK, BAD SMELL…perhaps emanations from last evening's chili beans with a「big」effect on「self, cerebral processing of data.」
　Some browsers will not display this glyph using certain fonts…the actual glyph may possibly be seen within other glyphs as an element.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: sense of smell; smell bad; stench; stink; smelly; to smell (bad)
Unihan extended: smell, stink, emit foul odor
EDRDG: stinking; ill-smelling; suspicious looking; odor; savor; fragrance; be fragrant; stink; glow; be bright

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.