元の象形文字（俣）は、「開口部のある人、下向きに突き出ている、緊張している、反対側も」または「開口部と天国のある人」の構成要素を使用しています。「人の天国の開口部」は、象形文字の意味が股間であることを明確にしています。「緊張して緊張している」または「分離した足ともう片方も」という現代化された単純な構成要素は、股間を形成する両足を説明するか、または分離した足の代替使用を明確に示しています。股間は非常に大きい必要はなく、人間の股間と同じくらい大きい必要もありません。股間は大きさではなく形であり、分離した足を曲げてかかとをつま先球に当てると、間違いなく股間のような形になります。木や象の股間も、人間の股間よりはるかに大きいことは間違いありません。「再び」、「屈服する」、「両方」、「これまたはあれ」の拡張された意味はすべて、人間の股間（および2人以上の「友人」の股間）にあるさまざまな開口部に関連付けられています…および/または性的奴隷にされた誰かの2本の分離した足。この基本的な形状は、他の多くの象形文字に意図的に適用されています。たとえば、象形文字の意味：女性、足を広げる、叩く、踊る、跳ねる、睾丸など、または股間を広げることに関連するもの。両方の意味、これまたはあれ、両方を生み出す、さらに、さらに、そしてさらにすべては、英語のことわざ「二人の先頭は一人よりまし」の起源である可能性があります。

Original glyph (俣) uses elements of「person with orifice, downward thrusting, taut, the other side too」or「person with orifice and heaven」「person's heavenly orifice(s)」that clarifies the glyph's meaning as CROTCH. Modernized simple elements of「tense and taut」or「dis-integrated foot and the other one, too」describe both legs forming a crotch, or refer plainly to the surrogate use of dis-integrated feet. Note that a CROTCH need not be very large, or as large as a person's groin—a crotch is a shape, not a size, and a dis-integrated foot bent with heel touching toe ball would certainly form a CROTCH shape. Crotches in trees or elephants can certainly be much larger than a human groin as well. Extended meanings of AGAIN, YIELDING, BOTH, this one OR that one, are all associated with various orifices situated in a human crotch (and the crotches of two or more 'friends')…and/or the two dis-integrated feet of someone enslaved for sex. This basic shape is deliberately applied in many other glyphs, for example, glyphs meaning: female, spread feet, whacking, dancing, prancing, testicles, etc., or anything associated with a spread crotch.
　 Meanings of BOTH, THIS OR THAT, YIELDING, FURTHER AND MORE, AGAIN—all are possible origins of the English proverb:「two heads are better than one」when used with or within a CROTCH, and in particular a crotch containing more than a single accessible orifice.
　The notion that this glyph represents "hand" ought to be addressed. Some artificially intelligent entities dogmatically state that the component 又 is "uncontroversially 'hand,' and not 'crotch' or anything genital, as described in the Shang-period attestations." Yet, after examining the 223 various glyphs that incorporate this element, such as 股 as one example, and noting that no modern dictionary lists the meaning as a hand, how can we agree with that assessment? It may be that the obfuscation of glyph meanings had already begun in the Shang-period attestations. Who knows? But no matter. debunKanji has never claimed that the meanings stated in traditional dictionaries are wrong. If a glyph is used today or in the past to express some given meaning as listed in mainstream scholarly works, then so be it. Our claim is that there are often, if not always, additional meanings contained within a glyph that are unsaid and no longer recognized today, and that these additional meanings were deliberate and intentional. That was the whole essence of the bawdy riddles when each glyph was created, long before ever used to express some concept in prose.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaninglless mnemonics)
Chinese: (once) again; also; both… and…; and yet; (used for emphasis) any way
Japanese: again, and, also, still, in addition, besides this, twice, or, otherwise, once again, You're kidding!
Unihan extended: and, also, again, in addition
EDRDG: or again; furthermore; on the other hand

Used within names (nanori)
やす