專 exclusivity, something specialized for a particular occasion or purpose or person, expert, monopolize, take sole possession of, singular, solely, entirely, concentrated and focused mainly on one thing 叀,寸,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

專

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

セン
SE　N

Kun-yomi

もっぱ(ら
mo　p　pa　ra

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

叀

セン,つつし,か accumulating on or in a shaft, spooling, spooled, held in reserve, generally, the whole of

　ARRAY, ROD with EXTRACTION, REASON FOR FALLING DROPS with LOOSE DRIPPING STENCH
…or: SCREWING, TWISTING NEEDLE within BLOCKED PLUGGED ORIFICE and CLOUD OF STENCH
　

寸

スン,× squeezing grip, feeling the flow of fluids pumping, firmly holding above the elbow while measuring someone's throbbing heartbeat or pulse, ancient unit of measure (approximately an inch, 2.5 cm), careful hands

　ONE, ARRAY OF ITEMS, ROD HORIZONTAL with STREAM and emphasis marker below rod
　

Meanings of elements

ACCUMULATING ON OR IN A SHAFT, SPOOLING, SPOOLED, HELD IN RESERVE, GENERALLY, THE WHOLE OF with FEEL OF FLUIDS PUMPING, SQUEEZING GRIP, FIRMLY HOLDING, THROBBING PULSE, APPROXIMATELY AN INCH 2.5 CM, CAREFUL HANDS

「Extraction of spooled, accumulated loose dripping stinky sticky stuff」with「needle twisting in blocked plugged orifice」and with「squeezing grip, careful hands, about a one inch grasp, throbbing pulse」refers to an EXPERT service provider, but also clearly a reference to medical treatment of a sexually transmitted infection by an EXPERT reaming the urethra with a bougie. Also possibly refers to the ONLY, SOLE, EXCLUSIVE method remaining for relief of an infected person who accepts social responsibility to exercise restraint, that is, to do it entirely yourself, to MONOPOLIZE yourself, MONOPOLIZATION, SOLE USE, EXCLUSIVE CONCENTRATION BY ONE person. Japanese usage as FETISH and STRONGLY ATTRACTED to something sexually and exclusively underscore these elemental meanings, such as someone afflicted by mentulomaniacal obsessive behavioural syndrome (MOBS) as the SOLE, EXCLUSIVE means of climax, BEHAVING SELFISHLY by grasping oneself, not sharing the love, BECOMING EXPERT AT DOING a single task.
　Some suggest that this glyph depicts many silk cocoons, loose and dripping being extracted, twisted and squeezed into a single thread being grabbed by a short leg attached to a spindle used to spool threads while maintaining screwing momentum, but how that scene relates to BEING A SELFISH EXPERT, MONOPOLIZING THE SPINDLE is unclear.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: for a particular person, occasion, purpose; focused on one thing; special; expert; particular (to sth); concentrated; specialized
Unihan extended: monopolize, take sole possession
EDRDG: specialty; exclusive; mainly; solely

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.