叐 approaching a goal, dog pricking, prodding, a dog-like prick, a prick like a dog's, getting started, starting one's prick 干,千,又,ー,友,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

叐

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

干

カン,ほ,～ぼ,ひ thrusting downward, to fuck, become drained of fluids, ebb; defensive; main trunk or shaft

　INVERTED PENIS, ROD DOWN
…or: ARRAY of SCREWING
　

千

セン,ち reciprocating seesaw motion, repeated swinging motion back and forth, thousand times, cheating at (something)

　REPEATED BOBBING with TWISTING ROTATION or THRUSTING MOTION
　

又

ユウ,また,また～ once again, this or that, yield, both, any method at all, crotch

　GASPING and TAUT
…or: LAME FOOT with the OTHER SIDE, TOO
　

ー

× HTML entity: ー repeated, bobbing

　REPEATED BOBBING
　

友

ユウ,とも friend; man's best friend

　HAND with CROTCH
…or: ERECT ROD with CROTCH
　

Meanings of elements

REPEATED BOBBING with a FRIEND
…or: REPEATEDLY HAND in CROTCH
…or: DOWNWARD THRUSTING PENIS and CROTCH
…or: THOUSAND TIMES with CROTCH

Fonts display these elements using some variations:「downward thrusting penis」with「crotch」(when used as an element in other glyphs). Or as「repeatedly with a friend」「repeated bobbing, hand in crotch」「thousand times with crotch」: all possible elements meaning APPROACHING A GOAL. Reference to a DOG PRICK as one that is「downward thrusting a thousand times in a friend's crotch」as if eternally hard and possessing a spearing baculum, as does a dog. Note that a「dog」is a euphemism for a male human among many cultures worldwide: STARTING A PRICK.
While the old glyph meaning 'dog' (犮) is similar, it still retains important differences. A dog is a relatively intelligent animal and does not often require 'pricking to make him go' as most any dog owner can attest. A dog soon learns to respond to the verbal commands of his master, and even to gestures. Instinctively a pack animal, a dog will follow the pack leader after the pack 'pecking order' is established (normally, a dog learns that the human master is the 'pack leader' and therefore has first pecking rights). A prod or prick might be necessary to use on a dog only when rabid, or while having gone wild with excitement during copulation, or in a fight with another dog (not unlike male humans in that limited regard, and many other animal species).

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Unihan extended: to prick a dog to make him go

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.