Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
TO U
nu su mu
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
「The whole point of legalism as it, from time to time, dominated Chinese law, was cruel and unusual punishment. As Li Si wrote 2,200 years ago: 'Only an intelligent ruler is capable of applying heavy punishments to light offenses. If light offenses carry heavy punishments, one can imagine what will be done against a serious offense. Thus, the people will not dare to break the laws.'」
[ https://prezi.com/ju1nonzljpiu/the-beginning-of-legalism/ 2023-05-17 ]
Some scholars explain in China, hawking up a large wad of sticky phlegm and then expectorating into a bowl together with a group of buddies was a token of a「vow among thieves」otherwise known today as 'virtual kinship.' Given the risk of transferring blood-borne diseases, probably this action was preferred over becoming a 'blood brother' that was rumored to be common among western hemisphere indigenous folks, yet it served a similar intent without being significantly more hygienic. It seems no mention is made anywhere of what happened later to the contents of that bowl, however, it can be imagined each thief would be required to do something repugnant, perhaps unforgettable (the purpose of this ritual), in order to prove loyalty to the gang, which also might be a bit unsanitary and aid in the transmission of diseases orally. In theory, anyone can just spit into the bowl, but who could drink from it and then later dishonor his fellow thieves, right? (…a thief could). While this explanation may or may not be true, it certainly is possible as a hazing-initiation ritual.
External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: to steal; to rob; to plunder; thief; bandit; robber
Japanese EDRDG: thief, to steal
Unihan extended: rob, steal; thief, bandit
Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that),
representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system!
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles?
Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today.
Sex had no shame in ancient China.
Why would it?
But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better?
Or could they have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon.
This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.
Primal elements
Chinese usage: 35 entries
Similar glyphs with related meanings: 9 entries
- Glyph.05891
- Strokes: 12
- grade_10
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.