違 violation, transgress, disobey; mistake, error; difference; to vary, not be in the usual condition; to not match what is correct; to be different from promised; to run counter to; to change into something out of the ordinary 𨑕,辶,辶,韋,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

違

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

イ
I

Kun-yomi

ちが(う　･　ちが(い　･　ちが(える　･　～ちが(える　･　たが(う　･　たが(える
chi　ga　u　･　chi　ga　i　･　chi　ga　e　ru　･　～chi　ga　e　ru　･　ta　ga　u　･　ta　ga　e　ru

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

𨑕

× HTML entity: 𨑕 dynastic Chinese service provider, prostitute, concubine, slit of disintegrated foot; to violate, to do violence to

　FOOT DRAGGING with ORIFICE
…or: MOTIONS of FOOT with ORIFICE
…or: emphasis on TAUT NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT with ORIFICE
　

辶

チャク,しんにょう HTML entity: 辶 foot motions, motion of feet, something in motion, taking steps

　DRIPPING, DRIP BY DRIP, ONE DROP AFTER ANOTHER, COOLING PROCESS, CONGEALING, CHANGE BETWEEN TWO PHYSICAL STATES, CEASE MOTION with TAUT NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT OF CHINESE FEMALE
…or: DOUBLED EMPHASIZED with TENSION, STRESS WITH SPRING-LIKE ACTION, FOOT and STRETCHED TAUT, THE OTHER SIDE TOO
　

辶

チャク,しんにょう HTML entity: 辶 foot dragging, dragging feet across a surface, foot motions, motion of feet, something in motion, taking steps

　marker on two LAME FEET, TENSION and TAUT, LEASHED
　

韋

イ,そむ soft skin, the softest skin, supple and soft leather, loins in spread-eagle pose, an orifice between the two feet

　FOOT on each side of ORIFICE
…or: ORIFICE with IMPEDING MOVEMENT on both sides
　

Meanings of elements

SERVICE PROVIDER, PROSTITUTE, CONCUBINE with FEET on both sides
…or: STEPS, MOTIONS with SOFT SKIN, THE SOFTEST SKIN, SUPPLE AND SOFT LEATHER, LOINS IN SPREAD-EAGLE POSE, AN ORIFICE BETWEEN THE TWO FEET

「Motion」with「two feet one on each side of orifice」「soft skin while spread-eagle」referring an adult preparing to smash the foot bones of a little girl and TO CHANGE INTO SOMETHING OUT OF THE ORDINARY, but perhaps first taking advantage of the situation with an orifice, or two.
「Spread-eagle position」in English was initially used to describe a sailor lashed to rigging in preparation for flogging, but used here perhaps to describe preparations for cudgeling her foot arches with the blunt end of a mattock, some other tool, or a large rock. Actions promised only that her feet would be no-longer-integrated without any guarantee of the results.
And as long as she was unable to move, also breaking in her orifices: TO DISOBEY, TO VIOLATE, TO SEPARATE, TO GO AGAINST, TO DIFFER FROM, TO VARY, TO NOT BE IN THE USUAL CONDITION, TO NOT MATCH WHAT IS CORRECT, TO BE DIFFERENT FROM PROMISED, TO RUN COUNTER TO suggesting that the hatchet job may have been botched for some reason, or another, perhaps due to some distraction whilst striking one of the foot arches.

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: to disobey; to violate; to separate; to go against
Japanese EDRDG: difference, differ
Unihan extended: disobey, violate, defy; be apart from

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.