蛟 dragon with the ability to control rain and flooding; ability to influence disasters 蚊,ハ,虫,交,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

蛟

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

コウ　･　キョウ
KO　U　･　KYO　U

Kun-yomi

みずち
mi　zu　chi

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

蚊

ブン,か mosquito

　INSECT INTRICATE
…or: INSECT and PALM DOWN WHACKING
…or: INSECT and GENTLE PALM CONTROL
　

ハ

× HTML entity: ハ emit downward

　EMISSIONS, EMIT DROPS
…or: HEAD TAUT
　

虫

チュウ,キ,むし snake, worm, caterpillar, insect, larva, bugs, pathogens, corkscrew demons, lower life form, to have a lover, person with a particular undesirable characteristic

　ROD in ORIFICE with REPEATEDLY BOBBING HEAD and DRIP
…or: TWO-SIDED LOOSE and DRIPPING
…or: ORIFICE BITING and DRIPPING
…or: MOUTH and TAIL
…or: SHORT LEG in VULVA
…or: WITHIN, AMONG and HEAD UP AND IN with emphasis
　

交

コウ,まじ,～か,かわ,こもごも to exchange, interchange, intersect, to mix, association, to take turns, to mingle together, making friends, to circle jerk, happy circle, fellowship, sexual relations

　PALM COVERING HEAD and EMISSIONS with HAND WHACKING MOTIONS
…or: PALM FOREFINGER and THUMB with CROSSOVER
…or: GENTLE INTRICATE STROKING with EMISSIONS
…or: PALMING HEAD with FATHER
　

Meanings of elements

EMISSION within MOSQUITO
…or: SNAKE, WORM, LOWER LIFE FORM, LOOSE DRIPPING in ORIFICE with CIRCLE JERK, SEXUAL RELATIONS

A bunch of「snakes mixing it up, exchanging」or「loose and dripping from orifices while palming and whacking, prone and stroking」as DRAGONS that can「control rain, floods, flying or dripping flow of fluids」? could these elements be any more obvious? a SCALY DRAGON is one covered with dried emissions the next morning, and clusterfucking male snake-dragons all have the ABILITY TO INFLUENCE PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTERS.
　「Emissions inside mosquito」are blood drops taken internally and「mixed, exchanged」with the next host…mosquitoes do not normally emit anything other than buzzing noises, and even then only other than when sucking blood (only females suck, not the males). However, 'backwashing' or「mixing the blood emissions」of a previous feeding victim into the currently-accessed host (「internal emission」) is what causes the transmission of disease among blood hosts, not unlike a shared hypodermic needle among junkies…so don't directly swat or smash a biting female, rather one should attempt to wipe it off with a quick brush from one side so as to not pump its internal emissions back into your system. In that sense, mosquitoes affect humans with the ABILITY TO INFLUENCE PUBLIC HEALTH DISASTERS, and it only requires a few pathogens to make one ill.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: a legendary dragon with the ability to control rain and floods; see also 蛟龍|蛟龙
Unihan extended: scaly dragon with four legs
EDRDG: dragon

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.