Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
YO KU
i gu ru mi
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
Other sources describe this glyph as representing a short WOODEN STAKE used for anchoring into soil, having one end tapered and placed into service only by repeated pounding into soil of some sort, or into flesh and flesh seams; or a DIRK (likely the source of the term 'dick' as it refers to a human penis, only mispronounced).
In the old days, a PILING was a「shaft of tapered wood」driven into soil. Elements of「one side lower」or「repeatedly bobbing head」with「penis」(㇂variant of 乚) with an emphasis marker stroke added to denote where the pounding occurs.
Meaning WILD DOG as the animal in an undomesticated, natural state (glyph contains no「taut, leash」element) CRUISING and SHOOTING one's dart or arrow, SPEARING PENETRATION of other human weaponry such as a dart, dirk, arrow, or tapered baculum (see 戊).
Note that for the species Canis lupus familiaris, the female is called a「bitch」and male a「dog」although the term dog is used today for both sexes, similar to 'cow' as it refers to all cattle, even though not technically correct (male 'cows' are bulls, as we all know but sometimes forget).「Cruising」is the dog using its sense of smell searching for bitches in heat, or estrus, releasing pheromones from the genitalia to attract dogs with which to copulate.
To harden the analogy between「dog penis」and LANCE, SPEAR, MILITARY FOOT SOLDIER, recall from freshman biology class that the penis of a dog contains a baculum, a spear-shaped bone that enables the start of copulation at a moment's notice, since the penis is therefore「ready-hard」at all times, as a foot soldier ought. The Chinese knew well the anatomy of dogs, since the animal was, and still is today, a popular favorite among the population as both breakfast nuggets and supper meat, and of course a natural for soup stock.
In China, outside invaders, or any enemies, have been referred to as「dogs」since antiquity:「A seemingly endless stream of tribal confederations and ethnic tribal groups invaded [C]hina from the heart of Asia since the founding of the civilization. At first the Chinese considered these 'dog people' to be poor and [weak] barbarians, using their dogs to trek meager supplies around a vast, endless wilderness.」
[ https://www.ancientmilitary.com/ancient-chinese-military.htm 2011-04-26 ]
It is not difficult to extend the concept of a dog hunting for a bitch in heat, poking its nose as it sniffs for hormones and thrusting a spear-shaped, baculum-equipped penis every which way and into every possible orifice seeking to spawn with any willing bitch (not so unlike humans, generally), to the MILITARY use of SWORDS, SPEARS and LANCES of a male animal poking every which way, into every possible conquered people seeking to spawn in any orifice, and particularly favoring those filled with night soil.
English epithet「dick dog」is redundant when referring to a male human, although it often does capture the intentions of his heart. A misnomer in literal biological terms, since human beings have no baculum or 'os penis,' but figuratively and euphemistically speaking—right on point. Usage as a STAKE relates to the shape of the dog baculum, a bone no longer present in human males. The world's military organizations have for thousands of years, and do still, refer to soldiers as「dogs」「dogfaces」with「dog tags」 and as「the dogs of war.」The purpose of the baculum present in most placental mammalian species is to enable thrusting copulation both at a moment's notice when the opportunity appears, and to continue unabated for long periods, both respected traits of a finely trained military system,「ready-hard」at all times, that formerly relied upon SPEARMEN as the vanguard.
The human species no longer is equipped with a penis baculum, since natural selection has eliminated that allele from the human gene pool: any human male equipped to enable thrusting copulation both at a moment's notice when the opportunity appeared and to continue unabated for long periods did so, hence those males were the easiest prey of predators and the penile baculum trait eventually died out in humans (naturally unselected). Most of such predators were the neighboring humans (all human societies were formerly cannibals) who would bait a rival troupe of humans using one of their own denuded young females, or a ewe, by staking the bait in an opportune location and then surprise attacking. This easy method of attracting and killing supper meat, fortunately or unfortunately as the case may be, did not cause the extinction of the human species as it did with the stool pigeon since the predators were themselves human, although soon only those humans without the sort of boner penis that resembled a dog dick remained within the gene pool. Needless to say, those surviving human males naturally selected via the mechanisms of cannibalism and opportunistic sex working hand-in-hand were also the most merciless, cunning, cruel, ruthless, competitive, blood-sucking, faceless, heartless sort of mercenary humans (although limpdicks sometimes), which has greatly influenced the poor quality of life experience on the planet for us today, and for most other remaining species.
[ see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baculum 2012-07-04 ]
Some researchers have suggested that the reason the Denisovans and Neanderthals finally became extinct was due to their level of compassion and kindness having been far greater than what became today's surviving humans, hence were easy prey:
「They have an unwarranted image as brutish and uncaring, but new research has revealed just how knowledgeable and effective Neanderthal healthcare was. The study, by the University of York, reveals that Neanderthal healthcare was uncalculated and highly effective -- challenging our notions that they were brutish compared to modern humans. The researchers argue that the care provided was widespread and should be seen as a 'compassionate and knowledgeable response to injury and illness.' It is well known that Neanderthals sometimes provided care for the injured, but new analysis by the team at York suggest they were genuinely caring of their peers, regardless of the level of illness or injury, rather than helping others out of self-interest. Lead author, Dr Penny Spikins, senior lecturer in the Archaeology of Human Origin at the University of York, said: 'Our findings suggest Neanderthals didn't think in terms of whether others might repay their efforts, they just responded to their feelings about seeing their loved ones suffering.'」 [ https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/03/180313130443.htm 2018-03-15 ]
Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: to shoot
Unihan extended: catch, arrest; shoot with bow
EDRDG: piling; ceremony radical (no. 56)
Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that)
and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system.
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is!
Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up.
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary.
This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.
Japanese vocabulary: 2 entries
Chinese usage: 11 entries
Used in glyphs (or, see also): 72 entries
Related glyphs [ Toggle font ]
Similar glyphs with related meanings: 10 entries
- Glyph.00095
- Strokes: 03
- elements
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.