靜 static, lacking movement, motionless, stillness, silent, quiet, suppress, quell, pacify, becalm 青,靑,爭,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

靜

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

セイ　･　ジョウ
SE　I　･　JO　U

Kun-yomi

しず～　･　しず(か　･　しず(まる　･　しず(める
shi　zu～　･　shi　zu　ka　･　shi　zu　ma　ru　･　shi　zu　me　ru

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

青

セイ,ショウ,あお,あお～ undefiled, young, unripe, inexperienced, immature, blue, green, greenish black

　PRICK with MEAT, FLESH
　

靑

× undefiled, young, unripe, inexperienced, immature, blue, green, greenish black

　PRICKED VULVA, JUXTAPOSED ORIFICES between SPREAD LEGS
…or: PRICK with A YEN FOR, LONGING, YEARNING
　

爭

ソウ,あらそ,いか to strive for, relentlessly pursue a goal, to vie for, battle for victory over [something]; contend, argue, dispute, conflict, debate, lacking evidence or data, resist, deny

　HAND REACHING DOWN with FIRM GRASP and STREAM OF FLUIDS
…or: MEAT or REPEATED STUFF FLYING FROM BOBBING HEAD and GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY, SCRAPING INSIDE with STREAM OF FLUIDS
…or: GRASPING MEAT of DISEASED PENIS, SWINE'S SNOUT, PIG'S HEAD, DOG SNOUT (as euphemisms) and STREAMING
　

Meanings of elements

CLEAN of CONFLICT
…or: ARGUE and BLUE
…or: PRICK MEAT with CONFLICT

「Conflict, arguing until blue」(in the face?) refers to passing out MOTIONLESS, unconscious due to apoplexy, or strangulation of course, with the result being QUELLED, CALMED, now PEACEFUL and SERENE, and with NO FURTHER MOVEMENT anticipated from the blue corpse at least.
　「Undefiled, pure and clean」of「conflict」meaning STATIC and lacking further movement, QUELLED, CALMED, all is now PEACEFUL and SERENE. Left element is「pure, clean, blue」and the right is [Chinese version]「hand reaching down」grabbing another person,「hand holding rod or streaming fluids」to facilitate the release of tension or fluids. Still today, many couples engage「prick meat, prick yen, longing」after a fight when the situation has QUELLED, CALMED, is now PEACEFUL and SERENE.
　Japanese elements are「head and neck, wrapped」in a「hand holding rod with stream of fluids」to indicate「contend, vie, dispute, conflict.」Seems to be referring to a dispute, perhaps among a group of concubines over the right to tend to their master by providing service, or more likely among a disappointed patron and the guards of a gateway to the brothel quarter, easily settled by the guards, naturally. Glyph also represents the resolution of the conflict with the「prick」in someone's「meat」when all the excitement is QUELLED, a scene common among fighting couples and on a battlefield in the good old days as blue corpses were ravaged by the victorious. In many fonts, the left elements are the original elements of「prick with vulva between spread legs, clean」to settle the issue.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: still; calm; quiet; not moving
Unihan extended: quiet, still, motionless; gentle
EDRDG: quiet

Used within names (nanori)
しずか

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.