Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
E TSU
i wa ku ・ no ta ma u ・ no ta ma wa ku ・ ko ko ni
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
「Divine prepubescence」with the old「in-and-out, end-to-end」describes a PRETEXT, a REASON GIVEN TO CONCEAL ONE'S TRUE PURPOSE OR INTENTIONS, a reason such as wanting only to speak with someone, and nothing else…. To PRETEND in English refers to make-believing, self-deception or fact denial, fanciful simulation, imaginary—necessary when utilizing something「divinely prepubescent for the old in and out」such as a tonguing mouth, yet the root origin of the word 'pretend' literally means to「stretch out before, in front of」that in the case of this glyph describes both the extension of a tongue outward from a mouth in order to lick something, and, the presentation of something in front of a mouth for subsequent insertion or suckling, and so on…「divine and meaningful, raised rod inserted within a laterally positioned cavity, in and out, end to end」or「one arrayed, lateral shuttling motions within mouth orifice.」
External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: to speak; to say
Japanese EDRDG: say, reason, pretext, history, past
Unihan extended: say
Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that),
representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system!
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles?
Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today.
Sex had no shame in ancient China.
Why would it?
But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better?
Or could they have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon.
This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.
Primal elements
Japanese vocabulary: 5 entries
Chinese usage: 7 entries
Used in glyphs (or, see also): 563 entries
Related glyphs [ Toggle font ]
Similar glyphs with related meanings: 33 entries
- Glyph.00111
- Strokes: 04
- elements
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.