矴 anchor, grapnel, that place, anchored in place 一,丿,ノ,叮,石,丁,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

矴

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

テイ
TE　I

Kun-yomi

いかり
i　ka　ri

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

一

イチ,イツ,ひと～ horizontal, array of items, reciprocating lateral motion, indicates width or extent, one segment, rod stalk or stem

　SIDE TO SIDE, BACK AND FORTH
　

丿

ヘツ,えい,よう straight up erect, quick jerking movement, stretched taut

　ERECT, FLING
　

ノ

× HTML entity: ノ head, sliding down, declining, dammed flow

　HEAD SLIDING DOWN
　

叮

テイ,× stinger, sting; exhort or enjoin repeatedly, importunate; courtesy; sticking point, penetration spot

　ORIFICE, MOUTH and MALE ADULT, ROBUST, ROD STREAMING, BUTYL, RAISED TO THE THIRD POWER
　

石

セキ,シャク,コク,いし rocky or rock-like, stones, rocks, minerals

　LATERAL MOTION, ROD and HEAD SLIDING or ERECTION with ORIFICE, MOUTH, CAVITY OR PASSAGE OF THE BODY
　

丁

チョウ,テイ,チン,トウ,ひのと male adult, blasting discharge from a barrel, robust, vigorous, flaming, butyl, cubed, raised to the third power, the ding in one's dong

　STREAMING from ROD
…or: ARRAY of STREAMING
　

Meanings of elements

STONE, ROCK and ROBUST, VIGOROUS
…or: ROCKS of a MALE

A「robust rock」is one large enough to act as an ANCHOR.「Stone with vigor」is not a quality normally associated with stone or rock, but as the「stones, rocks of a male」「testicles and male, arrayed for streaming rod」these elements could represent a grabbing point, or GRAPNEL, particularly in close hand-to-hand combat. Testosterone, the hormone of「vigor」is formed in the testes, known colloquially the world over as「male stones, rocks」and the location of many short hairs on the scrotal sac where one might be grabbed and held, controlled, with expressions in English with this identical meaning:「caught between a rock [one's rocks, stones, testicles] and a hard place [the erect shaft]」refers to being grabbed by the crotch and unable to resist fight back, or decide how to proceed for the time being. And「got me by the short hairs」[or, the short and curlies, and so on…note however that Chinese don't normally grow curly pubic hair].
　Furthermore, this same location above and around the scrotum was (and still is) an ideal location for securing restraints using a thin rope with high tensile strength as a means for safely transporting bound prisoners: to ANCHOR them in a line using a GRAPNEL (balls tightly bound in sac). No one can run off without losing his testicles, literally by tearing them off in a painful manner, as well as causing severe damage to those before and behind him. Hence, not many were will to attempt escape while so bound during transport. See 睪 and 尺.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: variant of 碇
Unihan extended: anchor; a place
EDRDG: anchor

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.