侅 to give to another; prepared and included in; embraced within 仏,亠,人,亻,亥,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

侅

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

カイ
KA　I

Kun-yomi

むせ(ぶ
mu　se　bu

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

仏

ブツ,フツ,ほとけ Buddha

　PERSON with STENCH CLOUD
　

亠

トウ,× emphasis on rod, palming, under control, covered

　THIS IS THE POINT emphasis on ROD, SEGMENT, ARRAY, INDICATES EXTENT
　

人

ジン,ニン,ひと,～り,～と person, a man, male adult

　HEAD or ERECT with TAUT, STRETCHED
　

亻

× person, rod head

　THE HEAD OF AN ANIMAL OR PERSON and VERTICAL, RECIPROCATING MOTION, ONE'S ROD, STALK OR STEM
　

亥

ガイ,カイ,い boar, male pig, swine, hog, hawg; porky, porking; mentulomaniacal obsessive behavioural syndrome (MOBS), rancid human male

　RANCID and TAUT ERECTION
…or: BLACK, LONG AND STRINGY or emphasis on ROD with LOOSE DRIPPING HEAD with MISSHAPEN DECLINING DAMMED FLOW and A MAN, MALE ADULT
…or: PALMING of LOOSE DRIPPING STINK by TAUT HEAD SLIDING PERSON
　

Meanings of elements

PERSON and BOAR, PIG
…or: ROD HEAD DAMMED and RANCID HUMAN MALE

「Person with male pig」giving another a gift, of food or other pleasures by EMBRACING the pig…? a zaftig embrace will fully encompass most folks.「Person」with「palming loosely, head of another person」also as GIVING TO ANOTHER, EMBRACING [his 'pig snout': see 彐] WITHIN a palming hand that had been well trained and PREPARED FOR just such an engagement.
　「rod head sliding of swine, rancid male」may well GIVE TO ANOTHER a dose of the clap along with the other emissions.「Person with rancid human male」may desire to GIVE AWAY that man to most anyone else.「Person with rancid human male」will surely contract some health problem from that male, GIVING TO ANOTHER the same infection whether wanted or not. And frankly, while EMBRACE does today suggest a happy holding of another person, the original meaning was「to add support all around」to prevent chunks from falling off, such as by fully wrapping with a poultice netting, a「person with rancid human male」providing medical preparations and treatments: PREPARED FOR and INCLUDING IN the full genitalia set, glans, shaft, scrotum, and likely the anus, too: EMBRACING the「pig meat」of a rancid human male.
　Some have suggested「Buddha with palms on person」as EMBRACED WITHIN faith, GIVING. And「control by Buddha over person」connotes INCLUSION whether one likes it, or not, with no real choice in the matter, such as bringing up a child with the religious teachings of a parent.「Person and pig」makes light of the fact that many statues of Buddha do not depict him as being underfed in any sense, in fact quite the opposite condition is obvious (outside of Thailand, that is).

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: to give; prepared for included in; embraced in
Unihan extended: to give; prepared for included in; embraced in
EDRDG: to give; prepared for included in; embraced in

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.