咫 short span of about the length of a hand; perineum being massaged internally; pink-'n'-stink grasp 吅,尸,丿,口,乀,ハ,尺,只,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

咫

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

シ
SHI

Kun-yomi

た
ta

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

吅

× juxtaposed orifices, rowdy behavior; female-female relations

　multiple ORIFICES, MOUTHS
　

尸

シ,かたしろ corpse, excretion squatting, buttocks

　MOVEMENT with ORIFICE
…or: ERECT with IN-AND-OUT
　

丿

ヘツ,えい,よう straight up erect, quick jerking movement, stretched taut

　ERECT, FLING
　

口

コウ,ク,くち orifice, mouth, cavity or passage of the body; an opening, aperture, vent

　ORIFICE
　

乀

フツ,ブチ,ま stretched taut; leashed under control of another; the other side (of something)

　STRETCHED TAUT
　

ハ

× HTML entity: ハ emit downward

　EMISSIONS, EMIT DROPS
…or: HEAD TAUT
　

尺

シャク,× measured distance between one's thumb and middle finger; in-line unit of length, a line of taut buttocks evenly spaced and shackled, prisoners and/or slaves

　GROINS LEASHED
…or: CORPSES CHAINED
…or: GENITALS TAUT
　

只

シ,ただ [emphatic modifier of another word]; free; only just simply (something); now, the immediate past or present

　ORIFICE EMISSION (downward)
　

Meanings of elements

ROWDY JUXTAPOSED ORIFICES with TAUT ERECT EMISSIONS
…or: MEASURED DISTANCE BETWEEN ONE'S THUMB AND MIDDLE FINGER with EMPHATIC MODIFIER, ONLY JUST SIMPLY
…or: UNIT OF LENGTH, A MEASURED DISTANCE and INTIMATE

What one can「grasp intimately within one's hand, using the thumb and middle finger」? a perineum, among other things:「taut buttocks with orifice emission」in one of the classic Chinese pink-'n'-stink grips described in detail and elaborately illustrated in Qing Dynasty sex manuals (used for therapeutic purposes only, of course). Note that 8 inches (20 cm) is approximately the length of a human male's erection if measured across his perineum from his buttocks hole, i.e.,「hole-to-hole of taut erection.」…but from the pubic bone to the tip of the glans on the top side of an erect penis, the average length is merely 13 cm, or about 5 inches.
[ https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/03/how-big-average-penis 2018-05-11 ]
Undeniably, glyph elements evoke reminiscence of D.J.Trump's assertion to「Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything.」As he expressed himself in 2005, with the elements suggesting all sorts of combinations, such as「a free one with the span of one's hand.」

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: 8 in. length unit of Zhou dynasty
Japanese EDRDG: short, span
Unihan extended: foot measure of Zhou dynasty

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.