Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
BO U
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
RASHLY MIXING may refer to all the shamans services, those of god-huckstering and soothsaying (for a fee) to tell a client what they need, then providing that need (for a fee) with services, subsequently rendering medical treatments with reaming and poultice dressings with net wrappings after infection (for a fee) and finally providing certification on a clean bill of health (for a fee) as a ticket to re-enter the brothels and repeat the cycle.
Related glyph (留) shown for comparison, having a similar meaning. Top strokes are quite similar to those meaning「slit, ovaries」(卯, 鄮) and seem to have been the original element in the oldest Chinese glyphs, with the related various access and egress actions, and some have suggested these elements are「ovarian slit with fleshpot」as the goods and services of the first BUSINESS EXCHANGES, BARTERING OR TRADING as the foundation of COMMERCE, that of selling young girls with no-longer-integrated feet as sex slaves who cannot escape by running off and are trained as concubines by the shaman, the first BUSINESS EXCHANGES that consisted of trade in human breeding stock, that of live human animal meat to wealthy patrons,「harnessed with controlled movement, fastened, detained, confined, keep in one place as one's fleshpot, wealth.」Furthermore, the shamans jealously guarded their business territories in order to maintain their monopoly for providing such public services as long as possible, and this glyph also refers to CONFINED TRADING, LIMITED VENTURES for that reason.
Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: commerce; trade
Unihan extended: trade, barter; mixed; rashly
EDRDG: trade; exchange
Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that)
and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system.
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is!
Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up.
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary.
This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.
Primal elements
Japanese vocabulary: 53 entries
Chinese usage: 38 entries
Used in glyphs (or, see also): 1 entry
Related glyphs [ Toggle font ]
- Glyph.05669
- Strokes: 12
- jlpt-N3 grade_05
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.