喋 nag, chatter, babble, twitter, tweets, sound of flood waters, chatting, gossiping 呭,木,口,枼,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

喋

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

チョウ　･　トウ
CHO　U　･　TO　U

Kun-yomi

しゃべ(る　･　ついば(む
sha　be　ru　･　tsu　i　ba　mu

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

呭

エイ,セツ,セチ,しゃべ,たの expressing consent; talkative

　ORIFICE, MOUTH, CAVITY OR PASSAGE OF THE BODY and THE WORLD (OF SOMETHING), HUMAN SOCIETY, AN AGE, GENERATION OF THIRTY YEARS, FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION
　

木

ボク,モク,き,こ～ wood, woody stalk, stem, wooden, a woody, tree, implanted, simple, simpleton, coffin, encased death, unfeeling, numb

　TWISTING a TAUT HEAD
…or: SCREWING EMISSIONS
…or: HAND on TAUT ROD
　

口

コウ,ク,くち orifice, mouth, cavity or passage of the body; an opening, aperture, vent

　ORIFICE
　

枼

⺕ウ,うすいきふだ,まど leaves, many needles and pricks, species regeneration; table leaf (surface extension); a page in binding, any sort of wood that has been flattened

　MANY, MANY with TREE
…or: GENERATION of WOODY SCREWING EMISSIONS
…or: MANY NEEDLE PRICKS and TREE
　

Meanings of elements

EXPRESSING CONSENT, TALKATIVE with WOODY STALK, A WOODY
…or: ORIFICE, MOUTH, CAVITY OR PASSAGE OF THE BODY with MANY NEEDLES AND PRICKS, SPECIES REGENERATION, WOODY EXTENSION, WOOD FLATTENED
…or: ORIFICE, MOUTH with WORLD OF HUMAN SOCIETY, THIRTY OR SO GENERATIONS of SCREWING EMISSIONS

「Mouth and leaves」realizing that leaves flutter and move with the slightest breeze nearly continuously, and a mouth moving in that manner would be NAGGING, CHATTERING, BABBLING, with the sound caused by many leaves in a breeze similar to the SOUND OF RUSHING FLOOD WATERS.
　「Mouths of one's generations from woody」as the BABBLE and TWITTER of a cave full of progeny, relatives, descendants.
　Perhaps the inane, insincere flattering meaningless BABBLE and TWITTER, CHATTER of a service provider to a long succession of「thirty or more prick-to-orifice」clients in a day and the SOUND OF RUSHING FLOOD WATERS in a full cave at the shaman's house of whore horror, forced to say something again and again, such as during an interval depicted by these elements「orifice with hung bastard woody screwing with emissions」moaning, murmuring, or talking while in intimate happiness within spread legs: YES!, YES! or OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD! or FUCK! OH FUCK ME! and so on, likely a service provider attempting to fool a client by duplicitous repetitive flatteries into believing that he is terrific so that he will come again and pay more fees, YOU'RE THE BEST I EVER HAD! and that sort of meaningless balderdash. Perhaps the source of the English term CLAPTRAP.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: flowing flood; to chatter
Japanese: talk, chat, to talk, to chat, to chatter, chatting without a break, talking without pause, amusing two-person dialogue, to chat enthusiastically, to talk on and on
Unihan extended: nag; chatter, babble, twitter
EDRDG: talk; chat; chatter

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.