詹 excellent; husband, braggart, brothel client, female role; verbose, talking too much, loquacious 厃,儿,言,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

詹

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

セン　･　タン
SE　N　･　TA　N

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

厃

セン,ギ,エン,あお,たるき,のき danger; looking upward

　HEAD AND NECK with ERECTION ROD
…or: HEAD in HIGH TENSION on CLIFF
…or: HEAD SLIDING with NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT and ROD ERECTION
　

儿

ジン,ニン,がい squatting copulation with bended knees, not walking, the male

　ERECTION, QUICK MOVEMENT with PENIS
…or: STRAIGHT UP ERECTION with BENT PENIS
　

言

ゲン,ゴン,い,こと intercourse oral or otherwise, to say or speak words, sexual activity and foreplay

　MANY LINES with MOUTH
…or: MANY RODS with ORIFICE
…or: PALM on ROD with HORIZONTAL RECIPROCATING MOTIONS and ORIFICE
　

Meanings of elements

LOOKING UPWARD, DANGEROUS while COPULATING with INTERCOURSE, SEXPLAY
…or: HEAD ROLLED BACK of ERECT ROD with INTERCOURSE COPULATION

This glyph has been replaced by the modern form of「tongue in mouth, tonguing array」(related glyph). Elements as「dangerously looking upward while squatting in fellatio foreplay」and in some danger of being squirted in the face since the male is ON THE VERGE,「peering up with squatting, bent legs」and「fellating during foreplay」in Chinese meaning EXCELLENT, as in the most excellent position for a HUSBAND, LORD, or BROTHEL CLIENT to be. Also meaning the FEMALE ROLE as a broad and sweeping statement regarding conjugal duties and a Chinese generalization about the purpose of (any?) female as a fellatrix.
　Extended meanings of LOQUACIOUS perhaps stem from the copious tonguing and mouth movements required while in such position (the female role, not the man standing). BRAGGART and LOQUACIOUS may just as likely be derived from the husband later discussing these moments with his homies (and that entails「speaking」). However, TALK TOO MUCH is exaggeratedly and graphically depicted in this scene since even a single word uttered by the fellatrix may be TALKING TOO MUCH for the patron, client, lord or husband.
　Elements as「in danger of lame speech」would be LOQUACIOUSNESS generally, and also BRAGGING, perhaps about how unafraid the person was while in a dangerous situation, meaning BRAGGADOCIO, TALKING TOO MUCH, VERBOSE with the exact same connotations as in English of GALL, CHUTZPAH. Another obscure meaning is「being divine.」

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: excellent; verbose
Unihan extended: surname; talk too much, verbose
EDRDG: surname; talk too much; verbose

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.