嗉 crop of an animal such as a bird chick lizard or dinosaur; bulging, filled full, fat; jug of fermenting beverage 口,素,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

嗉

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ソ
SO

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

口

コウ,ク,くち orifice, mouth, cavity or passage of the body; an opening, aperture, vent

　ORIFICE
　

素

ソ,ス,もと elemental, natural, basic essence, fundamental principle, bare naked, uncovered, unadorned, a raw natural state

　PRICK EJACULATING
…or: PRICK with WHAT!? HOLLERING, MOST TENDER, VERY LOOSE AND DRIPPING STINK with a SMALL STREAM OF EMISSIONS, DEEPLY FELT, DEEP FEELING, DIFFICULT TO FORGET
　

Meanings of elements

ORIFICE, MOUTH and PRICK EJACULATING, ELEMENTAL, NATURAL, BASIC ESSENCE, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE, BARE NAKED, UNADORNED, UNADULTERATED, A RAW NATURAL STATE
…or: ORIFICE, MOUTH and PRICK WITH VENOM, PAINFUL CONDITION with WHAT!? HOLLERING, MOST TENDER, VERY LOOSE AND DRIPPING STINK with a SMALL STREAM OF EMISSIONS, DEEPLY FELT, DEEP FEELING, DIFFICULT TO FORGET

「A crop (sometimes also called a croup or a craw, or ingluvies) is a thin-walled expanded portion of the alimentary tract used for the storage of food prior to digestion. This anatomical structure is found in a wide variety of animals. It has been found in birds, some non-avian dinosaurs, and in invertebrate animals including gastropods (snails and slugs), earthworms, leeches, and insects. …Scavenging birds, such as vultures, will gorge themselves when prey is abundant, causing their crop to bulge. They subsequently sit, sleepy or half torpid, to digest their food.」
　　[　https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_%28anatomy%29 2013-10-12　]　
　References to a CROP as a pouch within the alimentary tract of chicks, birds and other animals that suck for sustenance, a sack that is used for gorging. A bird's CROP is a pouch of flesh, not unlike no-longer-integrated feet, that contains undigested food that is carried back to its nest to feed its young, or to be regurgitated and digested later, normally coated at this point with mucus or stringy fluids to assist with regurgitation. Animals that suck for sustenance as a sack that is used for gorging from an「orifice, mouth with prick ejaculations」is perhaps not simply a coincidence. Notion of a WINE POT (not a given Chinese meaning) may be「essential, fundamental with mouth」with mucus or stringy fluids to assist with regurgitation and animals that suck for sustenance. May also refer to wondering about what to do with a mouthful of client jism mixed with gonorrhea gleet, a FERMENTING BEVERAGE.
　RAPTOR, VULTURE, SCAVENGER, BIRD OF PREY, eaters of dead meat, and so on also seems to describe most professional sex slaves rented for short terms as service providers.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: crop of a bird; fat; crop (of bird)
Unihan extended: bird's crop; wine pot
EDRDG: bird's crop or craw; wine pot

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.