靸 slipping into something, a slipper, slipping and sliding into a child's foot 廿,十,吸,革,及,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

靸

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ソウ　･　シュウ
SO　U　･　SHU　U

Kun-yomi

くつ
ku　tsu

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

廿

ジュウ,ニュウ,にじゅう twenty or so; many and various times; illegitimate child

　ARRAY of CAVITIES
…or: TEN (doubled)
　

十

ジュウ,ジッ,ジュッ,とお filled completely, perfectly full; screwing, rotating, twisting, turning; crossed shape; closing a hole or other opening, plugged, blocked; needle; ten

　VERTICALLY and HORIZONTALLY
…or: TOP TO BOTTOM and SIDE TO SIDE
　

吸

キュウ,す suck, inhale; to smoke

　ORIFICE, MOUTH and ONE AS GOOD AS ANOTHER, ATTAIN EQUAL STATUS AS ANOTHER, EXERT ONESELF TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTANCE, CONJUNCTION OF TWO ITEMS
　

革

カク,かわ processed skin, leather, tanned hide, expulsion while in a fixed position, reform (change shape), remove, revolution (fundamental change, turning over control to another)

　BASTARDS ORIFICE SCREWING
…or: TWENTY OR SO SCREWING in VULVA, JUXTAPOSED ORIFICES
　

及

キュウ,およ,および and (grammatical conjunction); one being as good as another, in time for, attain equal status as another, exert oneself to achieve acceptance, conjunction of two items

　POSSESSION of a CROTCH
…or: POSSESS AGAIN
…or: POSSESS and TAUT, LEASH
…or: ERECTION with NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT and CROTCH
…or: ERECTION ROLLED with YIELDING CROTCH AGAIN
　

Meanings of elements

TWENTY OR SO, BASTARD FATHERLESS CHILD and FILLED COMPLETELY, SCREWING TEN with SUCK, INHALE, SMOKING or ROLLED ERECTION IN CROTCH ORIFICE
…or: PROCESSED SKIN and ONE AS GOOD AS ANOTHER, ATTAIN EQUAL STATUS AS ANOTHER, EXERT ONESELF TO ACHIEVE ACCEPTANCE, CONJUNCTION OF TWO ITEMS

Babouche refers to slipping into a foot cover with no heel, resembling a pouch or pocket, something like a 'bedroom slipper.' Right element is「erection in no-longer-integrated foot, tense a long time, with crotch (or, with the other foot, too).」SLIPPING INTO A CHILD'S FOOT as the「processed skin of Chinese flowers」(鞾).
Foot binding was:
「…[T]he custom of applying painfully tight binding to the feet of young girls to prevent further growth. …The process was started before the arch of the foot had a chance to develop fully, usually between the ages of 2 and 5. …Qing Dynasty sex manuals listed 48 different ways of playing with women's bound feet」(after removing the bindings)
[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foot_binding 2012-12-17 ]

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: children's shoe (old); to wear ones' shoes babouche-style
Japanese EDRDG: child's shoes, slippers
Unihan extended: a child's shoes; slippers

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.