Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
SE I
chi ka u
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
Nevertheless, elements also are「breaking one's word」that suggests any VOW or OATH is worthless in actuality, since psychopathic liars can vow things, too, without remorse, and even good folks might not be able to resist some offers of「talented hands prick teasing with intercourse.」Best practices require not relying upon any vow or oath of another person for anything believed to be important.
「Use hands」with「hatchet」or,「pawing and scratching constantly like a prick-teasing pussy」「to flay, fillet, debark, remove skin」and as「break someone's will, bend, turn a corner, change direction, yield, submit」「submit to words」「yield to words」「words that bend, fold, turn」one's behavior are a PROMISE, OATH, VOW, PLEDGE, SWORN STATEMENT.
Elements individually are「talented hands with subtle and malicious prick-teasing intercourse」that suggests a process used to exact a PROMISE, OATH, VOW, PLEDGE, SWORN STATEMENT from a client or one's lord.
「Using talented hands to accomplish a task while wielding a hatchet」is universally recognized as an effective means for exacting most any sort of PROMISE, OATH, VOW, with the threat of enforcement constantly looming over the promisor's conscience and skull. Note however that some forms of duress are no longer permitted by the courts as a method of creating a legally enforceable contractual promise, but it still works pretty good [sic] in actual practice if not employed excessively. Be aware that any vow exacted under duress will not likely be honored by the swearer, eventually.
Monogamy was generally unusual except for some few women, being thought of as unnecessary and unwanted by most everyone, and given the fact that no one on Earth was sufficiently gullible to ever believe it in the old days anyway, so this type of pledge was rare other than for married women for whom it carried the penalty of death.
Also possible is a serious pledge not to physically attempt to「fold, spindle or mutilate」anyone's genitals during sex (never an unreasonable request), regardless of how promiscuous he or she may have been recently and therefore the need to revenge oneself upon man- or woman-hood using a hatchet, cleaver, upper and lower incisors (that make 'incisions'), rusty box cutter, dull edge of a spoon, etc.
Scholarly explanation:「use hands chop words」into a wooden tally used to record contracts and presumably refers to the bending and breaking of that wooden tally into two parts used to signify a promise or contract, with each party retaining one of the halves.
External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Chinese: oath; vow; to swear; to pledge
Japanese EDRDG: vow, swear, pledge
Unihan extended: swear, pledge; oath
Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that),
representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system!
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles?
Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today.
Sex had no shame in ancient China.
Why would it?
But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better?
Or could they have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon.
This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.
Primal elements
Japanese vocabulary: 29 entries
Chinese usage: 39 entries
- Glyph.08058
- Strokes: 14
- jlpt-N2 grade_08
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.