僧 phallus-shaped head; miter-headed; abbot, priest, monk; dickhead 亻,曾,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

僧

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ソウ
SO　U

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

亻

× person (male generally), rod head, head on rod

　THE HEAD OF AN ANIMAL OR PERSON and VERTICAL, RECIPROCATING MOTION, ONE'S ROD, STALK OR STEM
　

曾

ソウ,ゾウ,かつ,すなわち breached, penetrated wall and broken barrier, once, one and only one time, past tense indicator, a sign of something in the past, already happened, three generations removed: a descendant, as in a great-grandchild, or, an ancestor, as in a great-grandparent, a breached breech

　SPURTING SHAFT STANCE PERCOLATING, GUSHING HOT FLUIDS FROM HOLLOW SHAFTS SUCH AS LAVA, HOLLOW LEGS OF A CAULDRON PLACED IN EMBERS, EJACULATED SEMEN and EMIT UPWARD with ACCUSE, ROWDY BEHAVIOR, JUXTAPOSED ORIFICES, a CAVITY, OPEN CONTAINER with TONGUING MOUTH, HAVING A REASON TO DO SOMETHING, PRETENDING, A PRETEXT, EXCUSE GIVEN TO HIDE THE TRUE REASON FOR SOMETHING
　

Meanings of elements

PERSON and ONCE, ONE AND ONLY ONE TIME, PAST TENSE INDICATOR, ALREADY HAPPENED, THREE GENERATIONS REMOVED: A DESCENDANT, AS IN A GREAT-GRANDCHILD, OR, AN ANCESTOR, AS IN A GREAT-GRANDPARENT, ALMOST IMPENETRABLE WALL OR BARRIER

「Person」and「almost impenetrable wall」depicts someone with whom you are unable to reason, namely most religiously-titled individuals.「Person」resembling a「great-grandfather's penis with virgin great-granddaughter」as a reference to an ABBOT, the head MONK or PRIEST who wears a phallus-shaped MITER, and to lesser monks with old and wizened faces peering out from peaked hoods resembling the glans penis finally peeping from a wrinkled foreskin for perhaps the last time in one's life. Reference to a great-grandfather's only-once-more-in-a-lifetime ability to achieve a sustained erection with the supposedly chaste life of a monk is duly noted. And note that the Taoist sages had open disrespect for abbots, priests, and monks of any and all ranks and orders, equating them to effete sycophants and faceless, bloodsucking mercenaries who would relish ravishing their own great-granddaughters given any opportunity to do so, yet estopped by the「almost impenetrable barrier」of their religious positions and titles (publicly, at least).
Some browsers will not display this glyph using certain fonts…the actual glyph may possibly be seen within other glyphs as an element.

External source definitions …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may include extended definitions, euphemisms, and mnemonics)
Japanese EDRDG: Buddhist priest, monk

Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that), representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system! Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today. Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?

No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or could they have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon. This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.