「Fluid flows with head up and in annulus cockring and with wagging dog penis」suggests RETROGRADE EJACULATION during which semen is not spurted, but instead is forced into the urethra and usually ends up in the bladder—not a good condition for anyone suffering from a sexually transmitted infection and/or prostatitis, but that may cause some interesting sensations otherwise such as the increased pressure and stimulation caused by wearing a cockring enables more spectacular ejaculatory blowout, or, a blowout of one's internal tubing and valve system…individual cases vary, it seems. Prostitution districts were enclosed by walls and/or moats, often situated beside a castle for convenience and protection, and patrolled by the lord as the human authority figure of the area with gated health inspection stations and controlled, restricted access. Moreover, prostitution districts can be characterized as STAGNANT MOATS.
Always keep in mind that these glyphs most likely were originally designed by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that),
representing Chinese society many thousands of years ago, but intended NOT as a written or spoken language when created.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system!
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles?
Yes! It is, and often with multiple correct answers to each riddle, the same as is true today.
Sex had no shame in ancient China.
Why would it?
But, have there been necessary rewrites and altered explanations of the original elemental meanings over the centuries?
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how seemingly bad our human existence is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better?
Or could they have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any lexicon.
This site explains multiple meanings of glyphs ignored or censored by other sources, generally as being too embarrassing to admit today.
