𠎁 black rod head, lower class, ignorant, scary, dangerous, black person 亻,黑,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

𠎁

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

亻

× person, rod head

　THE HEAD OF AN ANIMAL OR PERSON and VERTICAL, RECIPROCATING MOTION, ONE'S ROD, STALK OR STEM
　

黑

コク,くろい black, melena, evil, sinister, secret, shady, illegal; dark, opaque, cannot see, cannot look at, internally ruptured and bleeding, many emissions with torn tissue tags and feces

　ORIFICE, CAVITY, BODILY OPENING or TO LITIGATE, ACCUSE, TO SUE, ROWDY BEHAVIOR, TWO ORIFICES each with emphasis EMIT UPWARD SPURTING with FECES and MANY EMISSIONS
…or: HIT THE BULL'S-EYE inside ORIFICES, CAVITIES OF THE BODY with emphasis or EMIT UPWARD SPURTING with FECES INSIDE SOIL WALLS and MANY EMISSIONS
　

Meanings of elements

PERSON and MELENA, EVIL, SINISTER, SECRET, SHADY, ILLEGAL, DARK, OPAQUE, CANNOT SEE, CANNOT LOOK AT, INTERNALLY RUPTURED AND BLEEDING

It is only quite recently that humanity generally began to decry racism. Prior to that, virtually everyone in the world was a racist—it was the common sense:
　「Since the 7th century, Africans have maintained a consistent commercial relationship with China. During the Tang Dynasty, Arab traders brought African slaves from east Africa to China. They comprised one of the many commodities in the Arabs' large-scale maritime trade with China. During this era, the first Chinese cultural perception of African people developed. These 'dark-skinned' people were known as Kunlun. They were described as lower class, ignorant, scary, and dangerous. Although there were far more enslaved Chinese, some wealthy Chinese preferred the exotic Kunlun slaves. African slavery in China peaked during the Tang and Song (960 A.D. to 1279 A.D.) dynasties but the number of African slaves taken to China during this 608-year period is unclear. By this point Chinese perceptions of the Kunlun became more complex. These perceptions ranged from strong and mysterious to frightening. The Kunlun in the Tang Dynasty era were portrayed in numerous stories of the period as heroic, resourceful, and—ironically culturally Chinese.」(that is, as「persons」)
　　[　https://www.blackpast.org/global-african-history/africans-and-african-americans-china-long-history-troubled-present-and-promising-future/ 2019-10-29　]　
　Nonetheless, elements perhaps describe a type of human character, not necessarily any particular color or genetically-related group of human beings: PSYCHOPATHS are most certainly not limited by any particular genetically-related group of human beings, and in dynastic China most folks (but not all by any means) were of Oriental descent:「person who is evil, sinister, secret, shady, illegal, opaque, cannot be seen, cannot look at, internally ruptured and bleeding many emissions with torn hymenal tissue tags and feces.」…as in BLACK-HEARTED.
　Some browsers will not display this glyph using certain fonts…the actual glyph may possibly be seen within other glyphs as an element.

External source definitions
none located, and you ought to ask yourself, why not?
definition speculated from combining the elements, or, from usage in other glyphs

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.