Perhaps「two rods down, down from/in orifice」: see the related glyphs that this element replaces. Elements may also be an inverted「piling on in layers, orgy, multiple penises, multiple feces, penis and feces」and so on (龷) inside a single「cavity」that suggest the perspective of an inverted person below rather than those working from above, with this element an integral part of 偠 that refers to the elasticity of a female's fundament and/or other fundamental cavity orifices, suggesting the realization that these are THINGS OF VALUE, ESSENTIAL NECESSITIES that can actually be rented for short terms, and are reusable almost immediately, with DROPS FALLING.
Perhaps an「array of rods in netting」of groin poultices (罒) that also infers DROPS FALLING and something ESSENTIAL, a thing of VALUE therapeutically.
Used to replace different glyphs, both meaning SOMETHING OF VALUE, ESSENTIAL or simply DROPS FALLING. (1) most commonly used as a replacement for「dew from heaven, sticky fluid down from spread legs, rain from Mother Earth」(雨) as applied to both rain as ESSENTIAL DROPS FALLING, and to both male and female orgasmic discharges of「sticky fluid down from spread legs.」(2) Some fonts use this to replace the element of「broken wine jar」(襾) with the bottom portion of the jar missing to create an open orifice, and would also account for the meanings of DROPS FALLING, now something ESSENTIAL was lacking (for some folks), and so another unopened wine jar is NEEDED, NECESSARY, ESSENTIAL, VALUED by the imbiber…note that spilled Chinese wine is a brown and sticky fluid. Scholars claim this as two hands holding a severed head with falling drops of blood, also with sticky fluids.
And, here is a good example of the same thing in English as with kanji glyphs. How many English speakers know that "fundamental" is the adjectival form of "fundament"? Even more fundamental than that are the questions of what is a fundament, and can you get along without one? That is exactly WHY a fundament was selected to represent the meaning of "fundamental." But, who thinks of that when the word "fundamentally" is used (as basic and essential as a fundament)? Probably, only those without one.