偸 steal, rob, pilfer, theft, operations guided solely by a selfish profit motive without regard for the welfare of others and protected by limited liability 亻,俞,兪,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

偸

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

ツ　･　トウ　･　チュウ
TSU　･　TO　U　･　CHU　U

Kun-yomi

ぬす(む
nu　su　mu

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

亻

× person, rod head

　THE HEAD OF AN ANIMAL OR PERSON and VERTICAL, RECIPROCATING MOTION, ONE'S ROD, STALK OR STEM
　

俞

× lord's assent, accede, consent; conveyed, gone to heaven, bevy of new divas, transport, delivery, consent to reaming meat

　ENTER, GO INTO, PENETRATE, PLACE INSIDE with RECIPROCATING ROD MOTION, INDICATES EXTENT and REAMING MEAT, PUNISHING, EXCRUCIATING, CUTTING INTO LIVING FLESH
…or: IN FRONT OF A PERSON, ASSEMBLY OF PEOPLE with AMPUTATION
　

兪

ツ,トウ,ユ,しかり lord's assent or consent; conveyed, gone to heaven

　ASSEMBLE FLESH, CHICKS AND BUNNIES with TWO MISSHAPEN LOOSE BUSTED FEET
…or: BECOME A MEMBER with RECIPROCATING ROD MOTION and CHICKS BUNNY MEAT and TWO NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FEET
　

Meanings of elements

PERSON who CONVEYS AWAY
…or: PERSON who REAMS MEAT, SHAFTING an ARRAY OF PERSONS
…or: ROD HEAD AMPUTATED, SENT TO HEAVEN

A「person who conveys away with the consent of human authority figures, the lord」but without authorization from the owner, is a THIEF, STEALING (see 愉 as the opposite case). In Chinese, somewhat more complicated, since actually the right element refers to the「emperor's assent」to perform an action and convey away, and in the case of either 兪 or 俞 as the right element, to「convey away divas for the lord's harem of herd meat」as THEFT from the parents at any price.
　Here indicating perhaps that if the emperor or lord agrees, then anything is acceptable, and this authority was abused to effectively steal anything from anyone, the same authority granted to the first corporations operating in India and eastward by consent of the regents of England [legalized pirates, or 'privateers'] for「monopolistically exploiting profits」from India, China, Japan, and elsewhere in Asia (sharing those profits with the royals directly, or today via taxation, duties, tariffs, and so on).
　So, it seems the underlying concept is a「person or legal entity who conveys away something belonging to another while believing that doing so is permissible」as a divine right, or as one's manifest destiny, or because life is unfair, or simply because he or she can get away with it and to the victor go the spoils: STEALING, or in other words, OPERATIONS GUIDED SOLELY BY A SELFISH PROFIT MOTIVE without regard for the welfare of others, protected by limited liability.
　More specifically,「person with bevy of new divas for the lord」as either purchased cheaply or kidnapped [formerly,「nabbing a ewe lamb」] that in any case were STOLEN.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: variant of 偷
Japanese: to steal
Unihan extended: to steal
EDRDG: steal

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.