勅 imperial decree, fiat, imperial order, performed magically 朸,口,木,吅,束,力,

注意：このページには、一部の読者にとって不快または不適切な内容が含まれている可能性があります。
Note: This page may contain content that is offensive or inappropriate for some readers.

MingLiU:

Mincho:

Gothic:

勅

Login Welcome!　Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.

On-yomi [ Toggle rōmaji ]

チョク
CHO　KU

Kun-yomi

いまし(める　･　みことのり
i　ma　shi　me　ru　･　mi　ko　to　no　ri

Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]

朸

リョク,おおご,おうご carrying pole, shoulder pole, milkmaid's yoke

　WOOD POWER
…or: STALK, STEM with FORCE, STRENGTH, EFFORT
　

口

コウ,ク,くち orifice, mouth, cavity or passage of the body; an opening, aperture, vent

　ORIFICE
　

木

ボク,モク,き,こ～ wood, woody stalk, stem, wooden, a woody, tree, implanted, simple, simpleton, coffin, encased death, unfeeling, numb

　TWISTING a TAUT HEAD
…or: SCREWING EMISSIONS
…or: HAND on TAUT ROD
　

吅

× juxtaposed orifices, rowdy behavior; female-female relations

　multiple ORIFICES, MOUTHS
　

束

ソク,たば,つか in a group bunched together; to bind, bound, tied, handle, manage, control, administer; bundled together, cluster; bundle of flashes

　VULVA, JUXTAPOSED ORIFICES with TREE, POLE, WOODY
…or: ORIFICE or TWO, ROWDY BEHAVIOR for WOODY
…or: WOODY in ORIFICE
…or: ROD in VULVA with EMISSIONS
…or: SCREWING in ORIFICE with EMISSIONS
　

力

リョク,リキ,リイ,ちから force, power, strength, effort

　QUICK MOVEMENT IN ANY DIRECTION and TENSE FOR A LONG TIME WITH GASPING
…or: ERECTION through NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT
　

Meanings of elements

BUNDLING EFFORTS
…or: HEAVY POLES FOR CARRYING with ORIFICE
…or: MANAGE, CONTROL and POWER, ERECTION IN NO-LONGER-INTEGRATED FOOT

「Manage with power」of a FIAT, IMPERIAL DECREE. But formerly the right element was「coerce」(敕) meaning「control by coercion, manage by whacking.」Note that it would not make too much sense to control a bunch of cargo or parcels tied to poles by whacking at them, and it would make even less sense for the dragon emperor himself to give such an order: left element is actually a「bundle, bevy of young virgins tied and bound for the lord's harem to be deflowered」being gathered (貴) as the result of the power of an imperial decree of course. Certainly a gaggle of recently-purchased young girls might get a bit excited, so some old fashioned stick whacking to put them back in line might have been a necessary but regrettable detail back in the old days. The「power to bundle for woody in orifice, vulva」clearly refers to the Chinese emperor and imperial decrees for gathering harem candidates. Some sources claim that the Chinese dragon emperor maintained harems of thousands, if not tens of thousands of young girls…after a while they all really would begin to look the same (see 同), no doubt.

Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: variant of 敕
Japanese: imperial decree, imperial edict
Unihan extended: imperial decree; Taoist magic
EDRDG: imperial order

Used within names (nanori)
て　･　のり

Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment (see 籒 for that) and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language. If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system. Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is! Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up. No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else. This site describes glyph meanings, not people. These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect. The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language? (More...) Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?

By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs, you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary. This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.