Login
Welcome! Introduction
Glyphs missing from your font set may appear strange, or not at all. We recommend enabling East Asian language support.
I ・ E
ko ro mo ・ ki nu ・ ~gi
Glyph elements [ Toggle Font ]
A wrapped DRESSING or cloth BINDING, wearing CLOTHS became「clothes, clothing, dress」in English. It is normally easier to clothe oneself and to apply foot bindings while in a sitting position while raising one's feet off the floor, one at a time.
The top of this glyph (palming, control, covering) is often split from the lower portion, and appears as two elements, with some other element in the middle depicting an integral function of some particular CLOTH DRESSING. Related elements provide a further explanation of wrapping long cloths around the feet of a person who may need to be sitting most of the time (lower-right element, 匕).
Significantly and not coincidentally, lower elements morphed from 'multiple sitting persons with no-longer-integrated feet' (比) and (化),「control over, emphasis on rod」with「transformation, bewitching, delusion and charm.」What causes the transformation of a person more completely in the minds of onlookers and the individual himself or herself more than the clothing being worn? what causes us to form our opinions of someone at first sight? what is the difference between a prostitute and a queen when both are naked? or clothed? (only her clothing). Is 'every girl really crazy about a sharp-dressed man' regardless of the actual person inside the cloth[e]s?
Furthermore, seen as part of old seal glyphs in China, these elements formerly were「control of sex slave's no-longer-integrated feet」with「reaming」on each side, still visible as the upper portion of 齊, 濟, 齋, and 韲 that was simplified within seal glyphs as 一, 丫, and ハ combined, drawn symmetrically as emphasis markers on each side of「sex slave slit」with「arrayed」: 示 except with (丫) 'female sex slave' replacing (丁) 'male.' Those older elements clearly are describing FOOT-BINDING CLOTHS.
Initially, male pants legs of trousers were not connected to each other at the crotch and were two separate pieces of clothing, which is why the plural forms of pants, slacks, trousers are still used for English words. Today, apparently no single Unihan character exists to represent the old lower element, probably since some folks wish to bury the past somewhat, which is understandable.
Modern definitions (that generally disregard history) …excluding politically incorrect concepts and other meanings deemed offensive today; may list only pigeonholed definitions, euphemisms, or meaningless mnemonics)
Chinese: to dress; to wear; to put on (clothes); clothes
Japanese: clothing, garment, dress, clothes, gown, robe, coating, the morning after a couple have slept together, parting ways the morning after having slept together
Unihan extended: clothes, clothing; cover, skin
EDRDG: garment; clothes; dressing
Always keep in mind that these glyphs were originally created by groups of clever old men as vulgar riddles and analogies for their own entertainment
(see 籒 for that)
and represented Chinese society many thousands of years ago, and not as a written or spoken language.
If these glyphs had been intended for language use, the sages could not have possibly designed a worse system.
Is it truly possible that all these glyphs started out as off-color jokes and puzzles? Yes! It is!
Sex had no shame in ancient China. Why would it? And now, there is a cover-up.
No one is suggesting these glyphs depict contemporary life in China, Japan, or anywhere else.
This site describes glyph meanings, not people.
These glyphs however, describe many and various things, including people, long before there were any notions of becoming politically incorrect.
The question to be answered is, should these glyphs continue being used, by anyone, anywhere, for expressing language?
(More...)
Despite how bad the human world is today, do you actually believe that the so-called good old days were any better? Or they could only have been worse?
By the way, with a limited number of the same elements used by the sages again and again to form these glyphs,
you should expect to find the same explanations again and again, as tedious as that may become, and as an inherent trait of any dictionary.
This site explains the dual meanings of glyphs most often ignored by other sources that provide you with only the sanctioned definition, generally.
Primal elements
Japanese vocabulary: 212 entries
Chinese usage: 215 entries
Used in glyphs (or, see also): 68 entries
Related glyphs [ Toggle font ]
- Glyph.00184
- Strokes: 06
- jlpt-N3 grade_04
Agree? Disagree? Express your opinion by posting a comment.
This publication has included material from the MDBG free online English to Chinese dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License.
This publication has included material from the JMdict (EDICT, etc.) dictionary files in accordance with the license provisions of the Electronic Dictionaries Research Group.
This publication has included material from the Unicode Character Database. Copyright © 1991-2016 Unicode, Inc. All rights reserved. Distributed under these Terms of Use.